The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
World history
The most marked limitation of the consuls’ power arose from the altered
position of the senate towards them. According to formal law the senators
stood in the same relation to the consuls as they did to the kings, being
not above but under the head of the republic: who every four years, on
the occasion of assessment for taxes, revised the list of senators and
appointed new ones to fill whatever vacancies had occurred. Now, however,
little by little, but ever more sensibly, began to be felt the enormous
predominance held in all ages by any large aristocratic corporation whose
members, all men of great political experience, have a life-long tenure
of office, over functionaries who are appointed to their responsible
positions for but the term of a single year. The senate represented the
unity, and the firmly established traditions of Roman politics and rule.
Not all the proud self-consciousness of a few powerful consuls could
prevent the office as a whole from coming to be considered as merely the
executive organ of the senate.
Since the foundation of the republic the people’s assemblies had also
assumed an entirely different character and position. The necessity felt
by the governing power at the overthrow of the Tarquins, to make sure of
the sympathy of the lower classes had brought the centuriate assembly--in
which both patricians and plebeians were bound together for the rendering
of important decisions--into great prominence. The function of this body
extended to the election of consuls, to the ratification or rejection of
measures proposed by the higher government, to the declaration of wars of
aggression, and lastly to the exercise of jurisdiction in criminal cases
where appeal, now the privilege of the plebeian as well as of the noblest
patrician, was permitted from the sentence of the quæstors.
PLEBEIANS AND PATRICIANS
The plebeians were soon forced to see, however, that under the new order
all the advantages of public life fell to the patricians. If this class
had at that time so far risen above its prejudices as to take into its
own circles the more nearly related plebeian families, to admit them to
equal marriage rights, to rights in the senate, and to eligibility for
the various public offices; and if it had further opened the state’s
domains to the mass of plebeians, and striven by a just apportionment of
the land to found a new and more contented peasant order, there would be
no need now to write the account of a hundred and fifty years’ struggle
between these two classes. But instead of doing these things the Roman
patricians displayed the most tenacious selfishness and greed--qualities
manifested, it is true, in equal degree by all their plebeian kindred.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account