The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 05 : $b the Roman Republic
World history
The work which Niebuhr began has been carried on by a school of
successors, until it must be said that the entire fabric of once-accepted
early Roman history has been torn into shreds. And in its place
has been substituted--practically nothing. It is true that Niebuhr
himself, iconoclast that he was, could not free himself from that
hypothesis-forming tendency which is the heritage of all active minds,
and put forward many prosaic guesses at the truth as substitutes for the
old-time poetical guesses which he had dethroned. But these latter-day
hypotheses, though accepted for the moment by many disciples of the
master historian, have been treated with far scanter courtesy by the
newer generation of critics, many of whom, however, have in turn supplied
their own surmises. The net result of all the researches of the past
century, and of all the surmises with which these researches have
been supplemented, is to leave us practically without any acceptable
hypothesis, except perhaps a meagre though consistent outline of
institutional and civic development.
And scarcely less vague are the outlines of the story of the early growth
of Rome, and of its internal government and external accomplishments
during some centuries of its undoubted existence. That it was ruled in
the early days by kings, has been accepted on the basis of universal
tradition, but it can scarcely be said that any one of these kings is to
be regarded to-day as a known historic personage. We are not even sure
as to the time when the kings were banished and a republican form of
government supplanted the monarchy, though the accepted dates ascribe
this transition to the year 509 B.C.--which, curiously enough, was the
time of the banishment of the Pisistratidæ from Athens. If this date be
accepted, it would seem that the evolution of political ideas in Greece
was curiously paralleled by the growth of the same spirit in Rome, and it
would follow that the civilisations of the two peoples were more closely
contemporaneous than they are usually considered to have been.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account