The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 06 : $b the early Roman Empire
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 06 : $b the early Roman Empire
World history
But the emptiness of these charges can be more clearly shown in the
case of the dependent kingdom of Armenia, which, according to the same
authority, Tiberius suffered to be seized by the Parthians, and wrested
from the patronage of the empire. It appears, on the contrary, from the
particular recital of Tacitus, that the bold occupation of this kingdom
by Artabanus was immediately resented by the emperor with the energy of
a younger man. Not only were the wild mountaineers of the Caucasus, the
Iberians and Albanians, invited to descend upon the intruders; not only
were the sons of Phraates released from their long detention at Rome,
and directed to present themselves on their native soil, and claim the
allegiance of their father’s subjects; but a Roman general, L. Vitellius,
a man of distinguished valour and experience, was deputed to lead the
forces of Asia and Syria against the enemy; and while it was hoped that a
vigorous demonstration would suffice to hurl him back from the territory
in dispute, instructions were not withheld, it would appear, to push
on if necessary, and smite the Parthians with the strong hand of the
empire. But these combinations proved speedily successful. Artabanus,
already detested by many of his most powerful subjects, was compelled to
descend from his throne, and take refuge in the far wilds of Hyrcania;
while Tiridates, the son of Phraates, was accepted in his room [35 A.D.].
The Roman army, which had crossed the Euphrates, returned victorious
without striking a blow, though, by a subsequent revolution, Artabanus
was not long afterwards restored, and admitted, upon giving the required
hostages, to the friendship of his lordly rivals [36 A.D.].
[Sidenote: [4 B.C.-37 A.D.]]
If Tiberius refrained from aggrandising his empire by fresh conquests, he
was not the less intent on consolidating the unwieldy mass by the gradual
incorporation of the dependent kingdoms enclosed within its limits. The
contests between two rival brothers, Cotys and Rhescuporis, in Thrace,
gave him a pretext for placing the fairest part of that country under
the control of a Roman officer, thus preparing the way for its ultimate
annexation. On the death of Archelaus, king of Cappadocia, in the year
17, his country was declared a Roman province, and subjected to the rule
of an imperial procurator. At the same period the frontier kingdom of
Commagene was added to the dominions of the republic under the government
of a prætor. Syria, the great stronghold of the Roman power in the East,
was still skirted by several tributary kingdoms or ethnarchies, such as
Chalcis, Emesa, Damascus, and Abilene; but the dependency of Judea, the
wealthiest and proudest of all these vassal states, was wrested in the
reign of Augustus from the dynasty to which it had been entrusted, and
was still subjected by his successor to the control of the proconsul at
Antioch.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive