The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 06 : $b the early Roman Empire
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 06 : $b the early Roman Empire
World history
The degeneration of morals and the decay of domestic virtue kept pace
with the passion for brutal spectacles. Strenuously as the emperor strove
to raise the standard of family life and to curb immoderate expenditure
on dress and food and the growing license of women by sumptuary and moral
edicts, to enforce legal marriage and the procreation of legitimate
offspring as a duty and honour by legal ordinances and curtailment of
privileges, to render divorce difficult and to check the rampant vice of
adultery, the state of indolent celibacy and the excesses of both sexes
in connection with it spread more and more, in the upper classes out of
liking for a licentious life and forbidden pleasures, in the lower from
poverty and laziness. The corruption of morals, checked but ineffectually
by Augustus, made rapid strides after his death; above all, when the
rulers themselves tore away the veil which still shrouded shameful living
under the first principate. But even Augustus could never disclaim his
origin from Venus Aphrodite, the ancestress of the family of Julius.[b]
AUGUSTUS MAKES EGYPT HIS PRIVATE PROVINCE
[Sidenote: [30 B.C.]]
The day of Egyptian independence was over as a matter of course. Cæsar
needed the country, with its corn and its riches, for his scheme of
reorganisation.
The city of Rome capitulated to the grain fleet of the Nile and sold her
ancient liberty for a supply of daily bread, and the price at least was
paid her. By the Cæsar Egypt had been conquered and under the rule of the
Cæsar she remained, like all countries which Cæsar was the first to unite
with the Roman Empire.
It is obvious that a conquered province cannot at once be placed on
exactly the same footing as older parts of the empire; a transition
period is almost always necessary; but Egypt never took quite the same
position as other subject countries. Before the partition of the empire
into senatorial and imperial provinces was effected, Egypt had come
to occupy a unique position with regard to the emperor; and after the
partition the ties which bound it to him became even closer. Among the
imperial provinces there was none more intimately related to the emperor
than this, which surpassed all others in importance. Egypt was of much
the same consequence to the Roman Empire as India is to the England of
to-day.
The wise yet strict government of a foreign power may be a blessing
to any country in comparison with the tyranny and extravagance of its
native sultans; but the foreign rulers profit even more by it, and are
therefore always striving to keep the rich country, with a population
ignorant alike of war and politics, in a state of political tutelage, to
perpetuate the gulf between the dominant and subject races, and to render
all interference on the part of rivals impossible. In a word, they keep
their most important province as the apple of their eye.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account