The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
World history
Numerous examples could be cited of almost incredible disorder in
the armies, originating generally in the misconduct of the imperial
government. Belisarius attempted, but found it impossible, to enforce
strict discipline,[12] when the soldiers were unpaid and the officers
authorised to act independently of his orders. Two thousand Heruli
ventured to quit his standard in Italy, and, after marching round the
Adriatic, were pardoned by Justinian and again engaged in the imperial
service. Procopius mentions repeatedly that the conduct of the unpaid
and unpunished troops ruined the provinces; and in Africa, no less than
three Roman officers, Stozas, Maximin, and Gontharis, attempted to render
themselves independent, and were supported by large bodies of troops.
The Greeks were the only portion of the population who were considered
as sincerely attached to the imperial government, or at least who would
readily defend it against every enemy; and accordingly Gontharis, when he
wished to secure Carthage, ordered all the Greeks to be murdered without
distinction. The Greeks were, however, from their position and rank in
society as burgesses or taxpayers, almost entirely excluded from the
army, and though they furnished the greater part of the sailors for the
fleet, they were generally an unwarlike population. Witiges, the Gothic
king, calls the Roman army of Belisarius an army of Greeks, a band of
pirates, actors, and mountebanks.
One of the most unfortunate measures of Justinian was the disbanding
all the provincial militia. This is incidentally mentioned in the
_Secret History_ of Procopius, who informs us that Thermopylæ had been
previously guarded by two thousand of this militia; but that this corps
was dissolved, and a garrison of regular troops placed in Greece. As a
general measure it was probably dictated by a plan of financial reform,
and not by any fear of popular insurrection; but its effects were
extremely injurious to the empire in the declining state of society, and
in the increasing disorganisation of the central power; and though it may
possibly have prevented some provinces from recovering their independence
by their own arms, it prepared the way for the easy conquests of the
Avars and Arabs. Justinian was desirous of centralising all power, and
rendering all public burdens uniform and systematic; and had adopted the
opinion that it was cheaper to defend the empire by walls and fortresses
than by a movable army. The practice of moving the troops with great
celerity to defend the frontiers had induced the officers to abandon the
ancient practice of fortifying a regular camp; and at last even the art
of encamping was neglected. The barbarians, however, could always move
with greater rapidity than the regular troops of the empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account