The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
World history
The hostile nations often pleaded their cause before the throne of
Constantinople; and the crafty Justinian, to whom the barbarians were
almost equally odious, pronounced a partial and ambiguous sentence, and
dexterously protracted the war by slow and ineffectual succours. Their
strength was formidable, since the Lombards, who sent into the field
several myriads of soldiers, still claimed, as the weaker side, the
protection of the Romans. Their spirit was intrepid, yet such is the
uncertainty of courage that the two armies were suddenly struck with a
panic; they fled from each other, and the rival kings remained with their
guards in the midst of an empty plain. A short truce was obtained, but
their mutual resentment again kindled; and the remembrance of their shame
rendered the next encounter more desperate and bloody. Forty thousand of
the barbarians perished in the decisive battle[22] which broke the power
of the Gepidæ, transferred the fears and wishes of Justinian, and first
displayed the character of Alboin, the youthful prince of the Lombards
and the future conqueror of Italy.
SLAVIC INCURSIONS
[Sidenote: [100-540 A.D.]]
The wild people who dwelt or wandered in the plains of Russia, Lithuania,
and Poland might be reduced, in the age of Justinian, under the two great
families of the Bulgarians and the Slavonians. According to the Greek
writers, the former, who touched the Euxine and the lake of Mæotis,
derived from the Huns their name or descent; and it is needless to renew
the simple and well-known picture of Tatar manners. They were bold and
dexterous archers, who drank the milk and feasted on the flesh of their
indefatigable horses; whose flocks and herds followed, or rather guided,
the motions of their roving camps; to whose inroads no country was remote
or impervious, and who were practised in flight, though incapable of fear.
The nation was divided into two powerful and hostile tribes, who pursued
each other with fraternal hatred. They eagerly disputed the friendship
or rather the gifts of the emperor; and the distinction which nature
had fixed between the faithful dog and the rapacious wolf was applied
by an ambassador who received only verbal instructions from the mouth
of his illiterate prince. The Bulgarians, of whatsoever species, were
equally attracted by Roman wealth; they assumed a vague dominion over
the Slavonian name, and their rapid marches could only be stopped by
the Baltic Sea, or the extreme cold and poverty of the north. But the
same race of Slavonians appears to have maintained, in every age, the
possession of the same countries. Their numerous tribes, however distant
or adverse, used one common language (it was harsh and irregular), and
were known by the resemblance of their form, which deviated from the
swarthy Tatar and approached without attaining the lofty stature and fair
complexion of the German.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account