The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
World history
The Persian and Roman empires were at this time nearly equal in power
and civilisation; both were ruled by princes whose reigns form national
epochs, yet history affords ample evidence that the brilliant exploits
of both these sovereigns were effected by a wasteful expenditure of the
national resources and by a consumption of the lives and capital of their
subjects which proved irreparable. Neither empire was ever able to regain
its former state of prosperity, nor could society recover the shock which
it had received. The governments were too demoralised to venture on
political reforms, and the people too ignorant and too feeble to attempt
a national revolution.
The governments of declining countries often give but slight signs
of their weaknesses and approaching dissolution as long as the
ordinary relations of war and peace require to be maintained only with
habitual friends or enemies, though the slightest exertion, created by
extraordinary circumstances, may cause the political fabric to fall to
pieces. The armies of the Eastern Empire and of Persia had, by long
acquaintance with the military force of one another, found the means of
balancing any peculiar advantage of their enemy by a modification of
tactics, or by an improvement in military discipline, which neutralised
its effect. War between the two states was consequently carried on
according to a regular routine of service, and was continued during a
succession of campaigns in which much blood and treasure were expended,
and much glory gained, with very little change in the relative military
power, and none in the frontiers, of the two empires.
[Sidenote: [527-532 A.D.]]
The avarice of Justinian, or his inconstant plans, often induced him to
leave the eastern frontier of the empire very inadequately garrisoned;
and this frontier presented an extent of country against which a Persian
army, concentrated behind the Tigris, could choose its point of attack.
The option of carrying the war into Syria, Mesopotamia, Armenia, or
Colchis generally lay with the Persians; and Chosroes attempted to
penetrate into the empire by every portion of this frontier during his
long wars. The Roman army, in spite of the change which had taken place
in its arms and organisation, still retained its superiority.[b]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account