The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 07 : $b the history of the later Roman Empire
World history
[31] [This is the story of Theophanes,[f] but John of Ephesus[d] tells
an anecdote in direct contradiction, according to which Sophia knew of
the wife’s existence, but refused to permit her to reside at the palace,
being resolved that no other queen should reign while she lived. When,
however, Tiberius was crowned he brought Anastasia to the palace and
compelled her recognition.]
[32] [Bury,[g] however, declares that “there is considerable reason to
remove Tiberius from his pedestal,” as he “did not make a good emperor.”]
[33] [Finlay[i] suggests that these men may have been deserters, but
gives very meagre reasons for his charitable supposition.]
[34] Baronius[j] gravely relates this discovery, or rather transmutation
of barrels, not of honey but of gold. Yet the loan was arbitrary, since
it was collected by soldiers, who were ordered to leave the patriarch not
more than one hundred pounds of gold.
[35] [A lunar eclipse two days earlier, fixes the date of the battle in
January, 623.]
[36] [This is Gibbon’s[b] opinion, but Finlay[i] thinks it “rests on a
very doubtful conjecture.”]
[37] [The words are given by Theophanes[f] but Bury[g] finds the lines so
metrical that he thinks they must have been quoted from a lost work by
George of Pisidia, whose _Heraclian Persian Expedition_ and _War with the
Avars_ are important sources of information in this respect.]
[38] [According to others the name should be Phalbas or Dorkon.]
[Illustration]
CHAPTER VI. HERACLIUS AND HIS SUCCESSORS
[610-717 A.D.]
“Everyone who reads the history of Heraclius,” says Bury,[b] “is met by
the problems: how did the great hero of the last Persian War spend the
first ten years of his reign; and why did he relapse into lethargy after
his final triumph?”
Many explanations have been attempted to account for the actions of
this man, who first built up an empire, and then allowed it to crumble
under his feet. Bury’s explanation is the assumption that his will was
naturally weak and his sensibilities strong, and that for a time he was
raised above himself, as it were, by an inspired enthusiasm. When in
later years this cloak of enthusiasm was withdrawn, the weakness of his
true character was laid bare.[a]
[Sidenote: [610-641 A.D.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account