The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
In Artabanus’ life-time the second place in the empire had been held
by one Gotarzes, who appears to have been his colleague in the upper
satrapies, and perhaps his lieutenant in his flight to Adiabene. But
there is monumental evidence that he was not, as Josephus says and
Tacitus implies, Artabanus’ son (except by adoption), and so we find that
the succession first fell to Vardanes, who coined money in September, 40
A.D. But in 41 A.D., Gotarzes gave Vardanes an opportunity to return; in
two days he rode 345 miles, and taking his rival by surprise he forced
him to flee, and occupied the lower satrapies, where he coined regularly
from July, 42 A.D., onwards. The renewal of civil war enabled the emperor
Claudius, with the aid of the Iberians, to drive the Parthian satrap
Demonax from Armenia and reseat Mithridates on the throne. Meantime
Gotarzes and Vardanes were face to face in the plain of western or
Parthian Bactria, but an attempt on the life of the latter having been
disclosed by his foe they made peace, and Gotarzes withdrew to Hyrcania;
while Vardanes, confirmed in his empire, returned to Seleucia and took it
in 43 A.D. after a siege of seven years.
That Vardanes was a great king is plain from the high praise of Tacitus
and the attention which the greatest of Roman historians bestows on a
reign which had no direct relations to Rome. Vardanes, whose last coin is
of August, 45 A.D., was murdered while hunting--a victim, we are told,
to the hatred produced by his severity to his subjects. But in judging
of the charges brought against him and his two predecessors, we must
remember that the rise of a new dynasty like that of Artabanus is always
accompanied by deeds of violence, and that the oppressed subjects are
simply the utterly unruly Parthian nobles who had lost all discipline in
the long civil wars, and could only be controlled by force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account