The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
After taking Valerian captive, Sapor pressed on towards Asia Minor, but
there was met by successful resistance. Many Persians were slaughtered by
Ballista, the Roman general. But the heaviest blow was dealt to the king
by the hand of a romanised Oriental. Odenathus (Odhenat), the chieftain
of the great trading city of Palmyra in the heart of the Syrian desert,
is said to have offered to enter into alliance with him, and to have been
completely repulsed. This is quite possible, for though Palmyra was a
part of the Roman Empire, yet since the emperor was a prisoner and Rome’s
dominion over the East was apparently broken, an ambitious Oriental might
easily have conceived the idea of playing an independent part as an ally
of the Great King. However that may be, Odenathus, on the watch for a
favourable place and opportunity, joined forces with Ballista, attacked
the Persians on their retreat, and inflicted a severe defeat upon them.
Part of the royal harem fell into his hands, and he even besieged
Ctesiphon once, if not twice.
Towards the end of Sapor’s reign a great change took place in the
oriental dominions of Rome. He appears to have supported Zenobia, the
widow of Odenathus, against Rome, though without lasting success. By the
time the emperor took Palmyra (273) and restored Roman supremacy over
those regions, Sapor was presumably already dead.
His son Hormuzd (Ohrmazd) I began to reign at the end of 272 or 273. As
a prince he appears to have fought gallantly against the Romans, and is
known to tradition by the surname of “the hero.” Among other legends of
all kinds he is said to have been satrap of Khorasan (which included all
the northeastern provinces) before his accession. As a king he had hardly
a chance of doing great deeds, for he reigned only one year.
According to the evidence of an inscription, his successor Bahram
(Varahran) I was not his son, as tradition has it, but his brother. He
is reported to have been an indolent and voluptuous sovereign. Manes
ventured to approach him, but by the machinations of the priests of
Zoroaster he was slain and his skin was stuffed and hung up to public
view. Bahram I reigned from about 274 to about 277.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account