The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 08 : $b Parthians, Sassanids and Arabs; the Crusades and the Papacy
World history
The history of Arabia and its inhabitants naturally divides itself
into two distinct and even dissimilar periods, that, namely, which
preceded the era of Mohammed, and that which followed it. Each of these
two periods, though comprising in its extent several minor phases and
fluctuations, now of advance, now of retrogression, bears, however, a
well-marked general character of its own. The first of the two periods
is distinguished as one of local monarchies and federal governments; the
latter commences with theocratic centralisation dissolving into general
anarchy.
The first dawning gleams of anything that deserves to be called history
disclose Arabia wholly, or nearly so, under the rule of a race of
southern origin; the genuine, or, as they are sometimes termed from a
mythical ancestor Kahtan, the Kahtanee Arabs. These, again, we find
subdivided into several aristocratic monarchical governments, arranged
so as to form a broad framework or rim around the central wilds of the
peninsula.
Oldest and chiefest among the Arab monarchies was that of Yemen; its
regal residence is said to have been in the now abandoned town of
Mareb, in the extreme south. After a devastating inundation, referred
with some probability to the first century of the Christian era, the
seat of government was removed from the ruins of Mareb to Sana, a city
which has continued the metropolis of Yemen to the present day. The
Yemenite kings, descendants of Kahtan and Himyar (the dusky), a name
denoting African origin, and each adorned with the reiterated surname
of “Tobba,” a word of African etymology, and signifying “powerful,”
are said to have reigned, with a few dynastic interruptions and palace
revolutions, for about twenty-five hundred years, during which long
period they commanded the direct obedience of the entire southern half
of the peninsula; while, by their tribute-collectors, and by chiefs of
kindred or delegated authority, they indirectly governed the northern.
One of these monarchs is asserted, though historical criticism will
hardly admit the assertion for fact, to have subdued the whole of central
Asia, and even to have reached the boundaries of China; while another
anticipated, so runs the story, the later and more authentic conquests
of his race on the north African continent. In both these cases Arab
chroniclers seem to have appropriated for their own rulers, not without
some additional exaggerations, the glories and exploits of the Egyptian
kings. But that theirs was a vigorous and in some respects a civilised
government is attested alike by the literary and the architectural relics
of their time. Their sovereignty was at last overthrown, 529 (A.D.) by an
Abyssinian invasion, and was re-established in 603 A.D. as a dependency
of the Persian Empire, till in the year 634 it was finally absorbed by
Mohammedan conquest.
[Sidenote: [100-500 A.D.]]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account