The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 10 : $b Spain and Portugal
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 10 : $b Spain and Portugal
World history
No sooner did Pope Martin hear of Pedro’s proclamation at Palermo and
Messina, of the enthusiasm shown towards the monarch by the Sicilians,
and of the flight of Charles, than he excommunicated the Aragonese. A
defiance next followed between the two rivals; who agreed to decide their
quarrel by combat, one hundred knights on each side, in the city of
Bordeaux, in June the following year. Until the appointed day arrived,
Pedro employed himself in causing his queen, who had arrived from Aragon,
to be acknowledged by the Sicilians, and in reducing some of the forts on
the Neapolitan coast. Leaving Constanza and his son, Don James, in the
government of the island, he returned into his states, for the purpose,
as was believed, of preparing for the combat. But that combat never
happened, nor, amidst the conflicting statements of historians, can we
easily decide to which of the royal rivals the disgrace of its failure
must be imputed. It is certain that Pedro caused one hundred knights to
be selected for the occasion, and that he appeared secretly at Bordeaux,
attended by three horsemen only, and returned to his dominions before the
lists were opened. For this extraordinary proceeding he appears to have
had sufficient reason. He found that a considerable number of troops were
silently moving towards the south of France, with the view, as he feared,
of seizing his person. If the Aragonese writers are to be credited,
the seneschal of Bordeaux, whom he consulted on the subject, informed
him that the field was not a safe one, and advised him not to risk his
person. This account is the more probable, from the fact that Pope
Martin had previously condemned the combat, and had required the English
king, Edward I, to whom Bordeaux belonged, and who was to be present on
the occasion, not to guarantee a fair field, nor to be present, either
in person or by his seneschals. What confirms the suspicion that some
treachery was meditated is that, though the English monarch was thus
enjoined not to visit the field, in other words, was given to understand
that the battle would not take place, no such intimation was made to the
king of Aragon.
[Illustration: A ROYAL ATTENDANT, SPAIN]
While Pedro remained in Aragon, his admiral, Roger de Lauria, reduced
the greater part of Malta (1284). He afterwards defeated a French
fleet within sight of Naples, taking the prince of Salerno, the son of
Charles, prisoner. The vindictive pope now proclaimed a crusade against
the excommunicated king of Aragon: his legate zealously preached it in
France, declaring Pedro deprived of the crown, which he conferred on
Charles de Valois, who was thus to possess both it and that of the Two
Sicilies. Fortunately for Pedro both Sicily and Aragon required other
weapons than a furious churchman could wield before they could be drawn
from his sway.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account