The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 10 : $b Spain and Portugal
History
The historians' history of the world in twenty-five volumes, volume 10 : $b Spain and Portugal
World history
It would be so easy to adduce evidence that the Christian powers have
done more harm to civilisation than the Moslem, that perhaps it would be
wiser to omit bigoted self-gratulations on the failure of Arab ambitions
in Europe, and be content with an impartial and non-dogmatic recital of
a conflict in which Europeans and Africans fought with a common greed
of power and masked primeval instincts under the names of religion and
patriotism. The aims of both were checked as much by internal dissensions
and treacheries as by any united opposition, and in neither Christian
nor Arab politics is there much food for pride in humanity. Leaving the
reader to find in the previously mentioned history of the Arabs the
account of Moslem rule, misrule, and feud in the regions they conquered,
we may turn to the equally sordid and selfish, and at times equally lofty
and heroic story of the Christians, who found refuge in rocky fastnesses
and there grew slowly and painfully to a new life and a large hope.
They had much to complain of from Arab cruelty to those who would not
accept the alternatives of “_Koran_ or tribute,” but war was especially
brutal in the Middle Age, and the Christians did not fail to revenge
their maltreated women and children on the non-combatants of the
other side. The pity one instinctively feels at the sufferings of the
Christians is somewhat stifled on realising that the same sufferings
had been or would speedily be visited on the Mohammedans or on other
Christians at the first opportunity. The examples of clemency which
are now the commonplaces, the demands of warfare, were at that time so
rare and amazing that they might almost be said to be always due to the
eccentricity of the conqueror. But to take up the story of the Christian
_Reconquista_:
Roderic was miscalled “the last of the Goths,” for there were two Gothic
rulers to succeed him. In the southeast Theodomir made peace with the
Arabs; reigned as a vassal; and was succeeded in 743 by the Gothic
Atanagild, whose realm was absorbed by Abd ar-Rahman in 755. In the
northwest was Pelayo, who made a great name on small capital.[a]
THE ASTURIAS AND LEON UNDER PELAYO (718 A.D.)
[Sidenote: [718 A.D.]]
The more zealous or more independent Christians, who, after the triumphs
of Tarik and Musa, were dissatisfied with the submission of Theodomir,
gradually forsook their habitations in the south to seek a more secure
asylum amidst the northern mountains of their country. They knew that in
the same hills the sacred fire of liberty had been preserved, in defiance
of Carthaginian, or Roman, or Goth; and they felt that to them was now
confided the duty of reviving its expiring embers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account