The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
But, before we give any account of the revolutions which took place
among the already existing powers of Western Europe, it will be well to
describe the geographical changes which were caused by the appearance
of absolutely new actors on two sides of the Empire. ♦Roman province
in Spain recovered by the Goths. 534-572.♦ One point however may be
noticed here, as standing apart from the general course of events,
namely, that the Roman province in Spain was won gradually back by the
West-Goths. ♦616-624.♦ The inland cities, as Cordova, were hardly kept
forty years, and the whole of the Imperial possessions in Spain were
lost during the reign of Heraclius. Thus the great dominion which
Justinian had won back in the West, important as were its historical
results, was itself of very short duration; a large part of Italy was
lost almost as soon as it was won, and the recovered dominion in Spain
did not abide more than ninety years.
But meanwhile, in the course of the seventh century, nations which
had hitherto been unknown or unimportant began to play a great part
in history and greatly to change the face of the map. These new
powers fall under two heads; those who appeared on the northern and
those who appeared on the eastern frontier of the Empire. The nations
who appeared on the North were, like the early Teutonic invaders of
the Empire, ready to act, if partly as conquerors, partly also as
disciples; those who appeared on the East were the champions of an
utterly different system in religion and everything else. In short, the
old rivalry of the East and West now takes a distinctly aggressive form
on the part of the East. ♦Wars between Rome and Persia.♦ As long as
the Sassanid dynasty lasted, Rome and Persia still continued their old
rivalry on nearly equal terms. The long wars between the two Empires
made little difference in their boundaries. ♦Wars of Chosroes and
Heraclius, 603-628.♦ In the last stage of their warfare Chosroes took
Jerusalem and Antioch, and encamped at Chalkêdôn. Heraclius pressed his
eastern victories beyond the boundaries of the Empire under Trajan.
But even these great campaigns made no lasting difference in the map,
except so far as, by weakening Rome and Persia alike, they paved the
way for the greatest change of all. ♦Extension of the Roman power on
the Euxine.♦ More important to geography was a change which took place
at somewhat earlier time when, during the reign of Justinian, the
Roman power was extended on the Eastern side of the Euxine in _Colchis_
or _Lazica_. ♦The Arabian vassals of Rome and Persia.♦ The southern
borders of each Empire were to some extent protected by the dominion
of dependent Arabian kings, the _Ghassanides_ being vassals of Rome,
and the _Lachmites_ to the east of them being vassals of Persia. But a
change came presently which altogether overthrew the Persian kingdom,
which deprived the Roman Empire of its Eastern, Egyptian, and African
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account