The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
The highest ecclesiastical divisions, the Patriarchates, though they
did not exactly answer to the Prefectures, were clearly suggested
by them. And whenever the boundaries of the Patriarchates departed
from the boundaries of the Prefectures, they came nearer to the great
divisions of race and language. For our purpose, it is enough to
take the Patriarchates, as they grew up, after the establishment of
Christianity, in the course of the fourth and fifth centuries. The
four older ones were seated at the _Old_ and the _New Rome_, and at
the two great Eastern cities of _Antioch_ and _Alexandria_. Out of
the patriarchate of Antioch the small patriarchate of _Jerusalem_ was
afterwards taken. This last seems a piece of sentimental geography;
the other divisions were eminently practical. ♦Rome.♦ Whether we look
on the original jurisdiction of the Bishop of the Old _Rome_ as taking
in the whole _prefecture_ of Italy or only the _diocese_ of Italy, it
is certain that it was gradually extended over the two prefectures
of Italy and Gaul. ♦Extended beyond the Empire.♦ That is, it took in
the Latin part of the Empire, and it spread thence over the Teutonic
converts in the West, as well as over Hungary and the Western Slaves.
♦Constantinople.♦ The Patriarchate of _Constantinople_ or New Rome took
in the Prefecture of Illyricum, and three dioceses in the Prefecture
of the East, those of Thrace, Asia, and Pontus. This territory pretty
well answers to the extent of the Greek language and influence. The
two Illyrian dioceses, possibly through some confusion arising out of
the two meanings of the word _Illyricum_, were claimed by the Popes of
Old Rome; but, when the Empires and Churches parted asunder, Macedonia
and Greece were not likely to cleave to the Western division. ♦Its
relation to the Eastern Empire and to the Slaves.♦ In course of time
the Byzantine patriarchate became nearly coextensive with the Byzantine
Empire, and it became the centre of conversion to the Slaves of the
East, just as the patriarchate of Old Rome was to the Teutons of the
West. ♦Antioch. | Jerusalem.♦ The patriarchate of _Antioch_, before its
dismemberment in favour of the tiny patriarchate of _Jerusalem_, took
in the whole diocese of the East, and the churches beyond the limits
of the Empire in that direction. ♦Alexandria.♦ The patriarchate of
_Alexandria_ answered to the diocese of Egypt, with the churches beyond
the Empire on that side, specially the _Abyssinian_ church, which has
kept its nationality to our own time. That these Eastern patriarchates
have been for ages disputed by claimants belonging to different sects
of Christianity is a fact which concerns both theology and history,
but does not concern geography. Whether the see was in Orthodox or
heretical—that is commonly in national—hands, the see and its diocese,
the geographical extent on the map, remained the same.
♦Later nominal patriarchates.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account