The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
The division of 887 parted off from the general mass of the Frankish
dominions a distinct _Kingdom of the East-Franks_, the acknowledged
head of the Frankish kingdoms, which, as being distinguished from its
fellows as the _Regnum Teutonicum_, may be best spoken of as a _Kingdom
of Germany_. ♦Merging of the Kingdom in the Empire.♦ But the lasting
acquisition of the Italian and Imperial crowns by the German kings, and
their later acquisition of the kingdom of Burgundy, gradually tended
to obscure the notion of a distinct German kingdom. The idea of the
Kingdom was merged in the idea of the Empire of which it formed a part.
Later events too tended in the same direction. ♦The Emperors lose Italy
and Burgundy, but keep Germany.♦ The Italian kingdom gradually fell
off from any practical allegiance to its nominal king the Emperor. So
did the greater part of the Burgundian kingdom. Meanwhile, though the
powers of the Emperors as German kings were constantly lessening, their
authority was never wholly thrown off till the present century. The
Emperors in short lost their kingdoms of Italy and Burgundy, and kept
their kingdom of Germany. In the fifteenth century the coronation of
the Emperor at Rome had become a mere ceremony, carrying with it no
real authority in Italy. In the sixteenth century the ceremony itself
went out of use. ♦Charles the Fourth crowned at Arles, 1365.♦ The
Burgundian coronation at Arles became irregular at a very early time,
and it is last heard of in the fourteenth century. ♦1792.♦ But the
election of the German kings at Frankfurt, their coronation, in earlier
times at Aachen, afterwards at Frankfurt, went on regularly till the
last years of the eighteenth century. ♦Endurance of the German Diet.♦
So, while the national assemblies of Italy and Burgundy can hardly be
said to have been regularly held at all, while they went altogether
out of use at an early time, the national assembly of Germany, in one
shape or another, never ceased as long as there was any one calling
himself Emperor or German King. The tendency in all three kingdoms was
to split up into separate principalities and commonwealths. ♦Comparison
of Germany, Italy, and Burgundy.♦ But in Germany the principalities and
commonwealths always kept up some show of connexion with one another,
some show of allegiance to their Imperial head. In Italy and Burgundy
they parted off altogether. Some became absolutely independent; were
incorporated with other kingdoms or became their distant dependencies;
some were even held by the Emperors themselves in some other character,
and not by virtue either of their Empire or of their local kingship.
♦The Empire identified with Germany.♦ Thus, as the Empire became more
and more nearly coextensive with the German Kingdom, the distinction
between the two was gradually forgotten. The small parts of the other
kingdoms which kept any trace of their Imperial allegiance came to be
looked on as parts of Germany.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account