The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
The result of this survey is to show how great, and at the same time
how gradual, was the extension of the German power eastward. A Roman
Empire with a long Baltic coast was something that had never been
dreamed of in earlier days. If the extension of the German name was
but the recovery of long lost Teutonic lands, the extension to them
of the Imperial name which had become identified with Germany was at
least wholly new. ♦The Slavonic lands Germanized.♦ In all the lands now
annexed, save in a few exceptional districts, German annexation meant
German colonization, and the assimilation of the surviving inhabitants
to the speech and manners of Germany. Colonists were brought, specially
from the Frisian lands, by whose means the Low-Dutch tongue was spread
along the whole southern coast of the Baltic. German cities were
founded. The marchlands grew into powerful German states. At last one
of these marchlands, united with a German conquest still further cut
off from the heart of the old German realm, has grown into a state
which in our own days has become the Imperial power of Germany.
* * * * *
♦Internal geography of Germany.♦
The internal geography of the German kingdom is the greatest difficulty
of such a work as the present. To trace the boundaries of the kingdom
as against other kingdoms is comparatively easy; but to trace out the
endless shiftings, the unions and the divisions, of the countless
small principalities and commonwealths which arose within the kingdom,
would be a hopeless attempt. ♦Growth of the principalities.♦ Still
the growth of the dukes, counts, and other princes of Germany into
independent sovereigns is the great feature of German history, as the
consequent wiping out of old divisions, and shifting to and fro of old
names, is the special feature of German historical geography. ♦Changes
in nomenclature.♦ The dying out of the old names has a historical
interest, and the growth of the new powers which have supplanted them
has both an historical and a political interest. ♦Origin of Prussia and
Austria.♦ It is specially important to mark how the two powers which
have stood at the head of Germany in modern times in no way represent
any of the old divisions of the German name. They have grown out of
the outlying _marks_ planted against the Slave and the Magyar. The
mark of _Brandenburg_, the mark against the Slave, has grown into the
kingdom of _Prussia_, the Imperial state of Germany in its latest form.
The _Eastern_ mark, the mark against the Magyar, has grown into the
archduchy which gave Germany so many kings, into the so-called Austrian
‘empire,’ into the Austro-Hungarian monarchy of our own day. ♦Analogies
between Brandenburg and other marchlands.♦ The growth of Brandenburg
or Prussia again affords an instructive comparison with the growth of
Wessex in England, of France in Gaul, and of Castile in Spain. In all
these cases alike, it has been a marchland which has come to the front
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account