The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
Tyrol, 1286.♦ Carinthia at first formed part of the same grant; but it
was presently granted to Meinhard Count of Görz and Tyrol. Görz passed
to another branch of the house of its own Counts. Three powers were
thus formed in these regions, the duchies of _Austria_ and _Styria_,
the duchy of _Carinthia_ with the county of _Tyrol_, and the county of
_Görz_.
♦Scattered territories of the House of Habsburg.♦
Thus under Albert the possessions of the House of Habsburg were large,
but widely scattered. The two newly acquired eastern duchies not only
gave its princes their highest titles, but they formed a compact
territory, well suited for extension northward and southward. ♦Falling
off of the Swabian lands.♦ But among the outlying Swabian territories,
though some parts remained to the Austrian House down to the end of the
German Kingdom, the tendency was to diminish and gradually to part off
altogether from Germany. In the lands south of the Rhine this happened
through union with the Confederates; in the Alsatian lands it happened
at a later stage through French annexation.
♦Connexion of Austria with the Empire.♦
It is to be hoped that it is no longer needful to explain that the
hereditary lands of the House of Habsburg or Austria had no inherent
connexion with the German Kingdom and Roman Empire of which they were
fiefs, beyond the fact that they were among its fiefs. They were
further connected with it only by the accident that, from Rudolf
onwards, many princes of that house were chosen Kings, and that, from
the middle of the fifteenth century, onwards, all the Kings were chosen
from that house and from the house into which it merged by female
succession. It is to be hoped that there is no longer any need to
explain that every Emperor was not Duke of Austria, and that every Duke
of Austria was not Emperor. But it may be needful to explain that every
Duke of Austria was not master of the whole dominions of the House of
Austria. ♦Divisions of the Austrian dominions.♦ The divisions, the
reunions, the joint reigns, which are common to the House of Austria
with other German princely houses, become at once more important and
more puzzling in the case of a house which gradually came to stand
above all the others in European rank. The caution is specially needful
in the case of the Swabian lands, as the history of the Confederates
is liable to be greatly misunderstood, if every Duke of Austria
who appears there is taken for the sole sovereign of the Austrian
dominions. It is needless to go here through all these shiftings
between princes of the same house. Through all changes the unity of
the house and its possessions was maintained, even while they were
parted out or held in common by different members of the house. But
it is important to bear in mind that some of the Dukes of Austria who
figure in the history of Switzerland were rather Landgraves of Elsass
or Counts of Tyrol than Dukes of Austria in any practical sense.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account