The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
Among the fiefs which were gradually annexed a distinction must be
drawn between the great princes who were really national chiefs owing
an external homage to the French crown, and the lesser counts whose
dominions had been cut off from the original duchy of France. And a
distinction must be again drawn between these last and the immediate
tenants of the Crown within its own domains, vassals of the Duke as
well as of the King. ♦The great vassals.♦ To the first class belong
the Dukes and Counts of _Burgundy_, _Aquitaine_, _Toulouse_, and
_Flanders_; to the second the Counts of _Anjou_, _Chartres_, and
_Champagne_. ♦Special character of Normandy.♦ Historically, _Normandy_
belongs to the second class, as the original grant to Rolf was
undoubtedly cut off from the French duchy. But the whole circumstances
of the Norman duchy made it a truly national state, owing to the French
crown the merest external homage. ♦Britanny.♦ _Britanny_, yet more
distinct in every way, was held to owe its immediate homage to the
Duke of the Normans. ♦The Twelve Peers.♦ The so-called Twelve Peers of
France seem to have been devised by Philip Augustus out of the romances
of Charlemagne; but the selection shows who were looked on as the
greatest vassals of the crown in his day. The six lay peers were the
Dukes of Burgundy, Normandy, and Aquitaine, the Counts of Flanders,
Toulouse, and Champagne. ♦Champagne.♦ This last was the only one of the
six who could not be looked upon as a national sovereign. His dominions
were _French_ in a sense in which Normandy or Aquitaine could not be
called French. ♦Different position of the Bishops in the Eastern and
Western kingdom.♦ The six ecclesiastical peers offer a marked contrast
to the ecclesiastical electors of the Empire. The German bishops became
princes, holding directly of the Empire. But the bishops within the
dominions of the great vassals of the French crown were the subjects of
their immediate sovereigns. The Archbishop of Rouen or the Archbishop
of Bourdeaux stood in no relation to the King of the French. The
ecclesiastical peerage of France consisted only of certain bishops
who were immediate vassals of the King in his character of King,
among whom was only one prelate of the first rank, the Archbishop and
Duke of _Rheims_. The others were the Bishops and Dukes of _Langres_
and _Laon_, and the Bishops and Counts of _Beauvais_, _Noyon_, and
_Châlons_. As the bishops within the dominions of the great feudatories
had no claim to rank as peers of the kingdom, neither had those
prelates who were actually within the King’s immediate territory,
vassals therefore of the Duke of the French as well as of the King.
Thus the Bishop of _Paris_ and his metropolitan the Archbishop of
_Sens_ had no place among the twelve peers.
§ 1. _Incorporation of the Vassal States._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account