The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
The Roman Empire was thus gradually formed by bringing, first Italy
and then the whole of the Mediterranean lands, under the dominion of
the one Roman city. In every part of that dominion the process of
conquest was gradual. The lands which became Roman provinces passed
through various stages of alliance and dependence before they were
fully incorporated. But, in the end, all the civilized world of those
times became Roman. Speaking roughly, three great rivers, the Rhine,
Danube, and Euphrates, formed the European and Asiatic boundaries of
the Empire. In Africa the Roman dominion consisted only of the strip
of fertile land between the Mediterranean and the mountains and
deserts. Britain and Dacia, the only two great provinces lying beyond
this range, were the last conquered and the first given up. In Western
Europe and in Africa Rome carried her language and her civilization
with her, and in those lands the Roman speech still remains, except
where it has been swept away by Teutonic and Saracen conquests. In the
lands from the Hadriatic to Mount Tauros, which had been brought more
or less under Greek influences, the Greek speech and civilization stood
its ground, and in those lands Greek still survives wherever it has not
been swept away by Slavonic and Turkish conquests. In the further east,
in Syria and Egypt, where there was an old native civilization, neither
Greek nor Roman influences took real root. The differences between
these three parts of the Roman Empire, the really Roman, the Greek, and
the Oriental, will be clearly seen as we go on.
FOOTNOTES:
[4] We shall come as we go on to two uses of the name in which Italy,
oddly enough, meant only the northern part of the land commonly so
called. But in both these cases the name had a purely political and
technical meaning, and it never came into common use in this sense.
[5] Some may think that the Cisalpine Gauls ought to be excepted, as
the common Roman story represents them as having crossed the Alps from
Transalpine Gaul at a time which almost comes within the range of
contemporary history. But this is a point about which there is no real
certainty; and it seems quite as likely that the Gaulish settlements on
the Italian side of the Alps were as old as those on the other side.
[6] In a more minute study of the history it will be found that Latin
Africa held out against the Saracens very much longer than Syria
and Egypt. But for our purpose the two may be classed together in
opposition to those lands in Europe and Asia which always remained
Roman or Greek.
CHAPTER IV.
THE DISMEMBERMENT OF THE EMPIRE.
§ 1. _The Later Geography of the Empire._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account