The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, TextFreeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
History
The Historical Geography of Europe, Vol. I, Text
Freeman, Edward A. (Edward Augustus)
Europe -- Historical geography
§ 2. _The Division of the Empire._
♦Change in the position of Rome.♦
The mapping out of the Empire into Prefectures, and its division
between two or more Imperial colleagues, led naturally to its more
lasting division into what were practically two Empires. The old
state of things had altogether passed away. Rome was no longer the
city ruling over subject states. From the Ocean to the Euphrates all
was alike, if not Rome, at least _Romania_; all its inhabitants were
equally Romans. But to be a Roman now meant, no longer to be a citizen
of a commonwealth, but to be the subject of an Emperor. The unity
of the Empire was not broken by the division of its administration
between several Imperial colleagues; but Rome ceased to be the only
Imperial dwelling-place, and, from the latter years of the third
century, it ceased to be an Imperial dwelling-place at all. As long
as Rome held her old place, no lasting division, nothing more than an
administrative partition among colleagues, could be thought of. There
could be no division to mark on the map. But, when the new system
had fully taken root at the end of the fourth century, we come to a
division which was comparatively lasting, one which fills an important
place in history, and which is capable of being marked on the map.
♦Division of the Empire between the sons of Theodosius. | A.D. 395.♦
On the death of Theodosius the Great, the Empire was divided between
his two sons, Arcadius taking the Eastern provinces, answering nearly
to the Prefectures of the East and of Illyricum, while Honorius took
the Western provinces, the Prefectures of Italy and Gaul. Through the
greater part of the fifth century, the successors of Arcadius and of
Honorius formed two distinct lines of Emperors, of whom the Eastern
reigned at Constantinople, the Western most commonly at Ravenna. But as
the dominions of each prince were alike Roman, the Eastern and Western
Emperors were still looked on in theory as Imperial colleagues charged
with the administration of a common Roman dominion. ♦Practically two
Empires.♦ Practically however the dominions of the two Emperors may
be looked on as two distinct Empires, the Eastern having its seat at
the New Rome or Constantinople, while the Western had its seat more
commonly at Ravenna than at the Old Rome.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account