The Historical Growth of the English Parish ChurchThompson, A. Hamilton (Alexander Hamilton)
History
The Historical Growth of the English Parish Church
Thompson, A. Hamilton (Alexander Hamilton)
Church architecture -- England
§ 56. When interest was first revived in ecclesiology, the fashion
of raising the quire and chancel above the rest of the church, by a
number of steps intended to be symbolical, became very prevalent. This,
however, was not in keeping with medieval practice. It is true that
occasionally chancels were raised high above the rest of the church.
At Walpole St Peter the chancel, rebuilt in the fifteenth century, was
brought up to the churchyard boundary, and apparently interfered with
a right of way which led round the back of the old chancel. It was
therefore built with a floor raised high above the nave, and the right
of way was preserved by piercing an arch below. St Leonard's at Exeter
has a chancel built over an archway which affords access to a narrow
street. A church built on a slope, like Tansor, ascends noticeably from
west to east. But the ascent is contrived, not by means of flights of
steps, but by an inclined plane. As a rule, floors of churches sloped
slightly upwards towards the altar. A perfectly level floor gives the
false effect in perspective of a downward slope: a floor, on the other
hand, with a gradual upward slope has a level effect. The floor of the
quire was sometimes elevated by a single shallow step above the floor
of the nave: very generally, it was on the same level: at St Michael's,
Cambridge, the level was slightly lower. The chancel, again, was a step
higher than the quire, and the altar stood slightly raised upon its
own oblong altar pace. The levels at Geddington in Northamptonshire
remain much as they were. The quire is on a level with the nave: the
chancel is a pace higher, and the altar stands upon its own pace. An
inscription round the foot of the chancel wall records the making of
the pavement (now renewed) and the _scabella_, by which the foot-paces
are almost certainly implied, of the altar in 1369. Round the lower
foot-pace of the south chapel is another inscription, apparently of the
same date. In no respect have modern restorations been so disastrous
as in the altering of original levels, in order to give the altar the
elevation which was supposed by the restorers to be necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account