The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2Müller, Karl Otfried
History
The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 1 of 2
Müller, Karl Otfried
Dorians -- History; Greece -- Antiquities, Dorian; Greece -- History -- Dorian Invasions, approximately 1125-1025 B.C.
557 V. 4. 4 In an inscription at Olympia (Brunck. Anal. II. p. 193.) he
was called the son of Hæmon; according to common tradition, he was
the son of Praxonides. In Eusebius (Hieronym.) should be written,
_Iphitus Praxonidis vel Æmonis f_.
558 I. 66, 67.
559 Concerning this word see Boissonade, Classical Journal, vol. XX. p.
289.
560 Boeckh Inscript. No. 11.
_ 561 E.g._ by Wolf Proleg. Homer. p. 67.
562 Of Clem. Alexand. Strom. I. p. 308.
563 For the date of Terpander, see book IV. ch. 6. § 1. note.
564 Scymnus Chius, v. 313. Strabo VI. p. 259.
565 Plutarch. Lyc. 13. whose words should be thus understood, “_Lycurgus
did not enact any written laws, but merely sanctioned existing
customs._” The ῥῆτραι however were evidently not mere ἔθη, but
oracular dicta, expressed in definite words, which had been
preserved from ancient times. Plutarch. Agesil. 26. calls them Αἰ
καλούμεναι τρεῖς ῥῆτραι, and also de Esu Carn. II. 1. ὁ θεῖος
Λυκοῦργος ἐν ταῖς τρίσι ῥήτραις; consequently this was in a certain
degree a fixed number.—One of these very regulations was μὴ χρῆσθαι
νόμοις ἐγγράφοις.
566 Plutarch, de Pyth. Orac. 19. αἱ ῥῆτραι, δι᾽ ὧν ἐκόσμησε τὴν
Λακεδαιμονίων, πολιτείαν Λυκοῦργος, ἐδόθησαν αὑτῷ καταλογάδην.
567 The Delphian Inscription in Boeckh Corp. Inscript. n. 1711. The
Cretan in Chishull Ant. Asiat. p. 135. The Samian and Prienian in
Chandler Inscript. p. 1. 38. 1, 2, 3. Marm. Oxon. p. 25.
568 I agree with Creuzer Histor. Ant. Fragm. p. 122. that it is
unnecessary _always_ to alter writers concerning ὄροι into
ὡρόγραφοι, _i.e._ chronologists. The above Samian inscriptions
expressly refer to historical works; and are we then to alter in
Herodian p. 7. (where see the passages quoted), and in p. 39. ἐν
Σαμίων ὄροις?
_ 569 Monumenta saxis sculpta et ære prisco_, Tacitus Annal. IV. 44.
570 I mention Eumelus in this place, as being a Lyric poet in the modern
sense of the word, on account of his ᾆσμα προσόδιον for the
Messenian Theoria to Delos, Pausan. IV. 4. 1.
571 Περὶ νομοθετῶν. He must however have either invented himself, or
adopted the inventions of others, if he mentioned the _names_ of the
twenty assistants and friends of Lycurgus, Plutarch. Lyc. 5.
572 Plutarch. Lyc. 31. and 11.
573 See book II. ch. 10. § 2.
574 He was anciently celebrated for his mildness. Plutarch in the Life
of Lycurgus, and de Adul. 16. On the other hand, Heraclides Ponticus
2. καὶ τὸν Χάριλλον (ΧΑΡΙΛΑΟΝ) τυραννικῶς ἄρχοντα μετέστησε.
575 Plutarch. Lyc.
576 Book III. ch. 1. The names of _Eunomus_ as the father and of
_Eucosmus_ as the son of Lycurgus (Pausan. III. 16. 5.) belong to
the class pointed out above, p. 69. note g. [Transcriber’s Note:
This is the footnote to “capture of Ægialea,” starting “The name of
Tisamenus.”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account