The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2Müller, Karl Otfried
History
The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2
Müller, Karl Otfried
Dorians -- History; Greece -- Antiquities, Dorian; Greece -- History -- Dorian Invasions, approximately 1125-1025 B.C.
In the first place, that the chief charge of his own
men should be made upon that part where it appeared most easy and
advantageous to break the line; and that at the same time his own line
should withstand the charge of the enemy: and, secondly, he might
endeavour to obtain the victory by extending his front so as to outflank
the enemy; a manœuvre which the Spartans seldom indeed attempted, being
content to hinder the enemy from effecting it. The chief point was to keep
the whole body of men in compact order, both in rapid advance and in
pretended flight:(1191) no bravery could excuse a man for quitting his
post.
9. The chief characteristic of the warriors of Sparta was great composure
and a subdued strength; the violence (λύσσα) of Aristodemus(1192) and
Isadas(1193) being considered as deserving rather of blame than praise;
and these qualities in general distinguished the Greeks from the northern
Barbarians, whose boldness always consisted in noise and tumult.(1194) The
conduct of the Spartans in battle denotes a high and noble disposition,
which rejected all the extremes of brutal rage; the pursuit of the enemy
ceased when the victory was completed;(1195) and, after the signal for
retreat had been given, all hostilities ceased.(1196) The spoiling of
arms, at least during the battle, was also interdicted;(1197) and the
consecration of the spoils of slain enemies to the gods,(1198) as in
general all rejoicings for victory were considered as ill-omened;(1199)
ancient principles of Greek humanity which we cannot but admire. War was
as much as possible confined to a measure of strength; and battle, as
Mardonius in Herodotus describes that of the Greeks in general,(1200) was
a kind of duel upon the principles of honour. In Peloponnesus, as well as
in Eubœa,(1201) the use of the different species of arms had perhaps been
regulated by the appointment of general councils; Sparta also retained
with a religious veneration the ancient institutions of sacred truces; as,
for instance, the Olympic armistice: it wished not only to celebrate its
native festivals in quiet,(1202) but even respected foreign solemnities;
thus, at so late a period as 391 B.C., that state allowed itself to be
delayed and deceived by an appeal of the Argives to “the sacred
months.”(1203) If then the state, so long as it remained true to these
principles, did not slaughter its enemies without aim or object, so much
the more sparing was it of its own soldiers, every moderate loss being
severely felt; but even in the engagements of the hoplitæ few of the
victorious party were lost. Every one knows of the tearless battle between
the Spartans and Arcadians, in which the state had no dead to mourn.(1204)
Nothing therefore can be less laid to the charge of Sparta than a violent
passion for war, a foolhardy and reckless desire of conquest. The latter
was also guarded against by the maxim of Lycurgus,(1205) “not to go often
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account