The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2Müller, Karl Otfried
History
The History and Antiquities of the Doric Race, Vol. 2 of 2
Müller, Karl Otfried
Dorians -- History; Greece -- Antiquities, Dorian; Greece -- History -- Dorian Invasions, approximately 1125-1025 B.C.
215 VII. 148. In this passage the battle, contrary to the calculation
before given (book I. ch. 8. § 6.) upon the authority of Pausanias,
is brought down to the time immediately preceding the Persian war,
as is evident not only from the word νεωστὶ, but also from the
circumstance that the Argives desired a thirty years’ peace, to
enable the children of the persons who had been slain to arrive at
manhood. From this, then, it follows that the Gymnesii, expelled
from Argos, did not obtain possession of Tiryns till _after_ the
Persian war (for that they were not there _during_ this war may be
inferred from Herod. IX. 28.), and the final victory over them would
then coincide with the conquest of Tiryns (book I. ch. 8. § 7). If
the oracle in Herod. VI. 19. had been accurately (και ΤΟΤΕ)
fulfilled, the battle must fall in Olymp. 70. 3. 498 B.C., but no
calculation can be founded on this datum.
216 The same argument applies here as in the case of the slaves who made
themselves masters of Volsinii. See Niebuhr’s Roman History, vol. I.
p. 101. sq. ed. 2. English Transl.
217 The liberation of Argive slaves is alluded to in a passage of
Hesychius in ἐλεύθερον ὕδωρ: ἐν Ἄργει ἀπὸ τῆς Συναγείας (perhaps
ΦΥΣΑΔΕΙΑΣ, cf. Callim. Lav. Pall. 47. Euphorion Fragm. 19. Meineke)
πίνουσι κρήνης ἐλευθερούμενοι τῶν οἰκετῶν.
218 Aristot. Pol. V. 2. 8.
219 Book I. ch. 7. § 16.
220 Not the Gymnesii. See vol. I. p. 191, note p.
221 Panathen. p. 270 A. B. cf. 286 A. I am also of opinion that
Pausanias was in error when (II. 19.) he states that the Argives had
from an early period been distinguished for their love of equality
and freedom.
222 See Thuc. V. 67, 72. Diod. XII. 80. Plutarch, Alcib. 15. Pausan. II.
20. 1. where the leader of the 1000 λογάδες is called Bryas, and
particularly Aristot. Pol. V. 4. Comp. Manso, vol. II. p. 432. with
the remarks of Tittmann, p. 602.
223 The Elean Περιοικὶς may serve for a comparison. This was the name of
all the territory which the Eleans had conquered in addition to
their original land, the Κοίλη Ἦλις. (Thuc. II. 25. Xen. Hell. III.
2. 23.) It was, however, divided into tribes, which increased or
diminished with the loss or accession of territory. The number of
the Hellanodicæ was arranged according to that of the tribes. The
ancient territory of the Eleans, Κοίλη Ἦλις, included four tribes;
Pisatis was divided into an equal number; and if the whole of
Triphylia obeyed the Eleans, four more were added. (See Paus. V. 9.
5.) Compare Aristodemus of Elis in Harpocration in v. Ἑλλανοδίκης,
Etym. Mag. p. 331, 20. For further details see a paper by the author
in Welcker’s and Naeke’s Rheinisches Museum, vol. II. p. 167.
224 Plutarch, Quæst. Græc. I. Hesychius.
225 Below, ch. 5. § 2.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account