[349] "Ramayana," ed. Schlegel, 1, 11 ff. A. Weber, "Vorles." s. 126^2. [350] "Vishnu-Purana," ed. Wilson, p. 470, 471. Lassen, "Ind. Alterth." 2^2, 319, 346, 963, 1001. [351] M. Müller has placed the period of the origin of the Brahmanas in the period from 800 to 600 B.C.--very successfully, so far as I can see. The collection of the Atharvan will belong to the end of this period, but not merely on the internal ground of the increase in the ceremonial brought about with and through the Brahmanas. The book of the law consistently cites the triple Veda; the sutras of the Buddhists and the Epos as consistently cite four. That the magic formulas of Atharvan and Angiras are quoted in Manu 11, 33, and not those of the Atharvaveda, seems also to prove that the latter collection was not made when the citations were written. Cp. A. Weber, "Vorl." s. 165^2. [352] "Rigveda," 10, 9, 5-7. [353] "Atharvaveda," 5, 19, 2, 1-5. [354] Darmesteter, "Haurvatat," p. 74. [355] "Atharvaveda," 2, 9. [356] "Atharvaveda," 1, 25, 2, 8, quoted by Grohmann in Weber's "Ind. Stud." 9, 391, 403, 406 ff. If Takman is called Deva, this is due to the connection in which he is placed with Varuna. Varuna sends diseases as punishments, dropsy, as a water-god, but fever also, and thus Takman can be called the son of Varuna. [357] "Rigveda," 1, 50, 11, 12; 10, 97. [358] Kuhn in his "Zeitschrift f. v. s." 13, 140 ff., where the coincidence of the German language is pointed out. [359] M. Müller, "Hist. Anc. Skt. Lit." p. 230 ff.; 245 ff. A. Weber, "Vorles." s. 48^2. [360] Burnouf, "Introduction," p. 456. M. Müller, _loc. cit._ p. 305. Lassen, _loc. cit._ 2^2, 474.