The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 1 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
When we attempt to form an accurate conception of the medical and
philosophical opinions of this singular man, we find ourselves beset
with almost insurmountable difficulties. His statements are so much
at variance with each other, in his different pieces, and so much
confusion reigns with respect to the order of publication, that we know
not what to fix on as his last and maturest opinions. His style is
execrable; filled with new words of his own coining, and of mysticisms
either introduced to excite the admiration of the ignorant, or from
the fanaticism and credulity of the writer, who was undoubtedly, to a
considerable extent, the dupe of his own impostures. That he was in
possession of the philosopher’s stone, or of a medicine capable of
prolonging life to an indefinite length, as he all along asserted, he
could not himself believe; but he had boasted so long and so loudly of
his wonderful cures, and of the efficacy of his medicines, that there
can be no doubt that he ultimately placed implicit faith in them. The
blunders of the transcribers whom he employed to copy his works, may
perhaps account for some of the contradictions which they contain.
But how can we look for a regular system of opinions from a man who
generally dictated his works when in a state of intoxication, and thus
laboured under an almost constant deprivation of reason.
His obscurity was partly the effect of design, and no doubt was
intended to exalt the notions entertained of his profundity. He uses
common words in new significations, without giving any indication
of the change which he introduced. Thus _anatomy_, in the writings
of Paracelsus, signifies not the dissection of dead animals to
determine their structure, but it means the nature, force, and
magical designation of a thing. And as, according to the Platonic and
Cabalistic theory, every earthly body is formed after the model of a
heavenly body, Paracelsus calls _anatomy_ the knowledge of that model,
of that ideal, or of that paradigm after which all things are created.
He terms the fundamental force of a thing _a star_, and defines alchymy
the art of drawing out the stars of metals. The star is the source of
all knowledge. When we eat, we introduce into our bodies _the star_,
which is then modified, and favours nutrition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account