The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)Thomson, Thomas
History
The History of Chemistry, Volume 2 (of 2)
Thomson, Thomas
Chemistry -- History
The objection to this mode of analyzing is the high price of the
carbonate of barytes. This is partly obviated by recovering the barytes
in the state of carbonate; and this, in general, may be done, without
much loss. Berthier has proposed to substitute oxide of lead for
carbonate of barytes. It answers very well, is sufficiently cheap,
and does not injure the crucible, provided the oxide of lead be mixed
previously with a little nitrate of lead, to oxidize any fragments
of metallic lead which it may happen to contain. Berthier's mode,
therefore, in point of cheapness, is preferable to that of Klaproth.
It is equally efficacious and equally accurate. There are some other
processes which I myself prefer to either of these, because I find them
equally easy, and still less expensive than either carbonate of barytes
or oxide of lead. Davy's method with boracic acid is exceptionable, on
account of the difficulty of separating the boracic acid completely
again.
4. The mode of separating iron and manganese from each other employed
by Bergman was so defective, that no confidence whatever can be placed
in his results. Even the methods suggested by Vauquelin, though
better, are still defective. But the process followed by Klaproth is
susceptible of very great precision. He has (we shall suppose) the
mixture of iron and manganese to be separated from each other, in
solution, in muriatic acid. The first step of the process is to convert
the protoxide of iron (should it be in that state) into peroxide.
For this purpose, a little nitric acid is added to the solution, and
the whole heated for some time. The liquid is now to be rendered as
neutral as possible; first, by driving off as much of the excess of
acid as possible, by concentrating the liquid; and then by completing
the neutralization, by adding very dilute ammonia, till no more can be
added without occasioning a permanent precipitation. Into the liquid
thus neutralized, succinate or benzoate of ammonia is dropped, as long
as any precipitate appears. By this means, the whole peroxide of iron
is thrown down in combination with succinic, or benzoic acid, while
the whole manganese remains in solution. The liquid being filtered, to
separate the benzoate of iron, the manganese may now (if nothing else
be in the liquid) be thrown down by an alkaline carbonate; or, if the
liquid contain magnesia, or any other earthy matter, by hydrosulphuret
of ammonia, or chloride of lime.
This process was the contrivance of Gehlen; but it was made known to
the public by Klaproth, who ever after employed it in his analyses.
Gehlen employed succinate of ammonia; but Hisinger afterwards showed
that benzoate of ammonia might be substituted without any diminution of
the accuracy of the separation. This last salt, being much cheaper than
succinate of ammonia, answers better in this country. In Germany, the
succinic acid is the cheaper of the two, and therefore the best.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account