The History of ChivalryJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
History
The History of Chivalry
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Chivalry; Crusades
[83] Mills mentions one from Manuel VII. to Pope Gregory VII., and Guibert
of Nogent speaks of another which, though he cautiously avoids naming the
emperor who wrote it, lest he should mislead from want of correct
information, could only have been sent, under some of the circumstances he
mentions, by Isaac Comnenus. Mills supposes it to have been the same with
a letter written by Alexius, though it differs in many parts from the
usual version of that epistle. Probably, however, this opinion is correct,
as a letter is stated to have been addressed to Robert of Flanders, who
was in his extreme youth in the time of Isaac Comnenus.
[84] Murator. Script. Ital.
[85] Albert of Aix; William of Tyre.
[86] Ibid.
[87] Robert, lib. i.
[88] Guib. Nogent, lib. ii.
[89] Hist. Hieros. abrev. Jacob. Vit. lib. i.
[90] Will. Tyr. lib. i.; Albert. Chron. Hieros.
[91] Will. Tyr.; Hist. Hieros.; Jacob. Vit. lib. i.
[92] Will. Tyr. lib. i.
[93] Albert. Aquensis; Hist. Hieros.; Jacobi Vitr.; Will. Tyr.
[94] See note V.
[95] William of Tyre says that he was wandering from place to place under
the protection of Guiscard. This opinion I have adopted, although Albert
of Aix declares that Peter joined him at Rome.
[96] Will. of Malmsbury.
[97] Mills.
[98] Will. Tyr. lib. i.
[99] Guibertus; Gesta Dei.
[100] A. D. 1095.
[101] Mills, chap. ii.
[102] Will. Tyr. lib. i.
[103] Robertus Monachus, lib. i.
[104] I have followed as nearly as possible the account of Robertus
Monachus, who was present. Having found in no book of any authenticity the
speech attributed by more modern writers to Peter the Hermit, I have
rejected it entirely as supposititious. Neither Robert, nor Albertus
Aquensis, nor William of Tyre, nor Guibert of Nogent, nor James of Vitry,
the most authentic historians of the crusade, some of whom were present at
the council of Clermont, and most of whom lived at the time, even mention
the appearance of Peter at that assembly. That he might be there, I do not
attempt to deny, but that he addressed the people I believe utterly
unfounded.
[105] See note VI.
[106] Robertus Monachus.
[107] Fulcher of Chartres; Guibert of Nogent; William of Tyre.
[108] See note VII.
[109] Guibert of Nogent.
[110] Fulcher of Chartres; William of Tyre.
[111] Guibert; Gesta Dei.
[112] Albert. Aquensis; Will. Tyr.; Guibert.
[113] Albert of Aix.
[114] See Ducange in Sig. Cruc.
[115] Albert of Aix; James of Vitry; Robert the Monk; Guibert.
[116] Fulcher.
[117] Albert of Aix; William of Tyre. Mills follows this opinion; Guibert
of Nogent and James of Vitry are opposed to it, and Fulcher gives a
different account also.
[118] Fulcher; Will. Tyr.; Albert Aquen.
[119] Will. Tyr.
[120] Albert of Aix; William of Tyre.
[121] Albert of Aix.
[122] Guibert.
[123] Albert of Aix.
[124] Ibid.
[125] Guibert.
[126] Baldric.
[127] Albert of Aix.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account