The History of ChivalryJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
History
The History of Chivalry
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Chivalry; Crusades
[165] Mills, in speaking of this interview, does not distinguish between
the coat-of-arms and the mantle or pallium. They were, however, very
different, and never, that I know of, worn together. The coat-of-arms was
usually extremely small; and the form may be gathered from the anecdote of
an ancient baron, who, not readily finding his coat-of-arms, seized the
cloth of a banner, made a slit in the centre with his sword, and passing
his head through the aperture, thus went to battle. These customs however
often changed, and we find many instances of the coat-of-arms being worn
long. The mantle was the garb of peace, and was even more richly decorated
than the coat-of-arms. Another peaceful habiliment was the common surcoat,
which differed totally from the tunic worn over the armour, having large
sleeves and cuffs, as we find from the notes upon Joinville. The size of
this garment may be very nearly ascertained from the same account, which
mentions 736 ermines having been used in one surcoat worn by the king of
France. See Joinville by Ducange.
For the use of the pallium, or mantle, see St. Palaye--notes on the Fourth
Part.
[166] I have not chosen to represent this interview in the colours with
which Mills has painted it. The princess Anna, from whom he took his view
of the subject, can in no degree be depended upon. Her object was to
represent her father as a dignified monarch, receiving with cold pomp a
train of barbarous warriors; but the truth was, that Alexius was in no
slight measure terrified at Godfrey and his host, and sought by every
means to cajole him into compliance with his wishes. Almost every other
historian declares that the crusaders were received with the utmost
condescension and courtesy. Robert of Paris, one of Godfrey's noble
followers, did indeed seat himself on the throne of Alexius, and replied
to Baldwin's remonstrance by a braggart boast, for which the emperor only
reproved him by a contemptuous sneer. This, however, would, if any thing,
prove that the pride and haughtiness was on the part of the crusaders
rather than on that of the imperial court.
[167] Albert of Aix; William of Tyre.
[168] Albert of Aix.
[169] Vertot.
[170] Robert the Monk.
[171] Gerusalemme, cant. i.
[172] What the relationship exactly was I have not been able to discover.
Mills does not satisfy me that the mother of Tancred was the sister of
Robert Guiscard. The expressions of Ralph of Caen on the subject appear to
be obscure.
[173] Albert of Aix.
[174] St. Palaye.
[175] Mills, chap. 3.
[176] Fulcher.
[177] Raoul de Caen.
[178] William of Tyre.
[179] Raoul de Caen; William of Tyre; Albert of Aix; Guibert.
[180] Orderic. Vital. lib. ix.
[181] Boemond had inherited all his father's hatred to the Greek
sovereigns, and had waged many a bloody and successful war against Alexius
himself.
[182] Will. Tyr.; Albert. Aquens.
[183] Raoul de Caen; Guibert.
[184] Alexiad par Ducange.
[185] Guibert, lib. iii.
[186] Radulph. Cad. cap. 11.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account