The History of ChivalryJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
History
The History of Chivalry
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Chivalry; Crusades
[238] Raimond de Agiles.
[239] William of Tyre; Raimond de Agiles; Guibert de Nogent.
[240] Fulcher, cap. 4; William of Tyre.
[241] Ten at a time were admitted within the walls, but not more.
[242] June 29, A. D. 1097.
[243] Fulcher, cap. 5; Raimond d'Agiles; Orderic Vital; Raoul de Caen.
[244] Mills avers that the chiefs separated by mutual consent. I have
found nothing to confirm this opinion. Radulphus says that there was a
rumour to that effect, but shows that it could not be just, as the baggage
of the troops of Boemond and his party had, by the error that separated
them, been left with the other division. William of Tyre leaves the
question undecided. Fulcher says, absolutely, that the separation
originated in a mistake. Orderic Vital follows the same opinion. Raimond
d'Agiles is not precise, but he says that it was done inconsiderately; and
Guibert decidedly affirms that it was accidental, and through the
obscurity of the morning in which they began their march.
[245] William of Tyre.
[246] Fulcher; Raimond d'Agiles; Albert.
[247] Fulcher makes it amount to nearly three hundred and sixty thousand
combatants; and Raimond reduces the number to one hundred and fifty
thousand.
[248] Fulcher.
[249] Ibid; Guibert.
[250] William of Tyre; Guibert; Fulcher, cap. 5.
[251] Guibert; Will. of Tyr.
[252] Fulcher; Radulph. Cad. cap. 21.
[253] William of Tyre; Guibert; Fulcher.
[254] Fulcher, cap. 5; William of Tyre.
[255] William of Tyre.
[256] Raoul of Caen.
[257] Albert; Raoul of Caen; William of Tyre.
[258] Albert.
[259] Raoul of Caen.
[260] Fulcher; Albert; Raoul of Caen.
[261] Albert of Aix informs us, that the ladies of Boemond's camp, seeing
the merciless fury with which the Turks were dealing death to all ages and
sexes, clothed themselves in their most becoming garments, and strove to
display their charms to the best advantage, for the purpose of obtaining
the durance of the harem rather than the grave. Albert was not present,
and did not even visit the Holy Land; and I find his account in this
respect confirmed by no other historian. The good canon, indeed, was
somewhat fond of little tales of scandal, so that I feel inclined to doubt
his authority, where such matters are under discussion. He has an anecdote
in a similar style appended to his history of the taking of Nice.
[262] Radulphus, cap. 22.
[263] William of Tyre.
[264] Orderic Vital; Guibert.
[265] Albert of Aix; Fulcher, cap. 5; William of Tyre.
[266] Radulph. Cadom. cap. 26.
[267] Fulcher; Albert of Aix.
[268] Albert; Radulphus Cadomachus, cap. 27, 28, _et seq._; William of
Tyre.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account