The History of ChivalryJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
History
The History of Chivalry
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Chivalry; Crusades
[448] Guibert, lib. vii.; Robert.
[449] Holy War.
[450] Raimond.
[451] Robert; Albert; Guibert, lib. vii.
[452] Fulcher mentions several ladders, but says they were too few.
[453] Albert of Aix; Guibert.
[454] Raimond; Albert.
[455] Albert of Aix.
[456] Guibert; Albert.
[457] Albert of Aix.
[458] Raimond d'Agiles; Guibert.
[459] Albert of Aix.
[460] Raimond d'Agiles; Albert of Aix.
[461] Albert describes perfectly the effect of the Greek fire, and says it
could only be extinguished by the means of vinegar, which, on the second
day, the crusaders provided in great quantity.
[462] Raimond.
[463] Guibert; Albert of Aix.
[464] Raimond d'Agiles; William of Tyre.
[465] Robert; Guibert. lib. vii.; Albert.
[466] 15th July. A. D. 1099.
[467] Guibert; Raimond.
[468] Albert; Robert.
[469] Ibid; Guibert.
[470] Guibert; Raimond d'Agiles; Robert.
[471] Tancred and Gaston of Bearn had promised quarter to these unhappy
wretches, and had given them a banner as a certain protection. It was
early the next morning, before those chiefs were awake, that this massacre
was committed by some of the more bloodthirsty of the crusaders. Tancred
was with great difficulty prevented from taking signal vengeance on the
perpetrators of this crime.--Guibert; Albert.
[472] The story of the second massacre rests upon the authority of Albert
of Aix, from whose writings it has been copied by all who have repeated
it. Albert of Aix never visited the Holy Land. None of those who were
present at the fall of Jerusalem (that I can discover) make the slightest
mention of such an occurrence; and we have the strongest proof that part
of Albert's story is false; for he declares that all the Saracens were
slaughtered in this second massacre, even those who had previously been
promised protection; and we know that many were sent to Ascalon.--See
_Guibert_, lib. vii. Robert, who was present speaks of many who were
spared.--_Robertus_, lib. ix. Fulcher, who was in the country, if not
present, does not allude to a second massacre. Raimond d'Agiles, who was a
witness to the whole, passes it over in silence; though each of these
persons always speaks of the slaughter of the Saracens as the most
praiseworthy of actions. The Archbishop of Tyre also, who copied Albert
wherever he could be proved correct, has stamped doubt upon this anecdote
by omitting it entirely. I have thought fit to notice this particularly,
because Mills lays no small stress upon the tale.
[473] Guibert; Albert; William of Tyre.
[474] See Raimond d'Agiles; Guibert; Albert; Brompton; William of
Malmsbury.
[475] Fulcher, cap. 18; Robert. Mon. lib. ix.
[476] Godfrey appears never to have taken the title of king, from a
feeling of religious humility.
[477] Robert.
[478] Albert; Will. Tyr.
[479] Albert.
[480] He was taken, after having suffered a complete defeat from the emir
Damisman, as he was hastening to the succour of Gabriel of Armenia.
[481] Will. Tyren.; Radulph.; Cadom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account