The History of Chivalry; Or, Knighthood and Its Times, Volume 2 (of 2)Mills, Charles
Philosophy
The History of Chivalry; Or, Knighthood and Its Times, Volume 2 (of 2)
Mills, Charles
Chivalry
The forms of chivalric initiation in Spain were similar to those in other
countries. The bath--confession--vigil in a church--mass--the spurs--the
girding with the sword--the accolade,--these were the chief ceremonies.
The knight by his oath expressed willingness to die either for the defence
of his law, or of his king or country.[177] The sword was then ungirt from
him by some person of honour, who by so doing was supposed to become his
padrino, or godfather in chivalry, and to confirm the knighthood thus
bestowed. No circumstances could ever justify the cavalier in bearing arms
against his padrino. He was, on the contrary, to defend him by his sword
and his counsel to the utmost of his ability, and to be every thing to
him, as a _man_ was to his lord in feudal relation.
These were the ancient ceremonies; but they were simplified in subsequent
times. The mere dubbing was then held sufficient; and, by a law of
Ferdinand and Isabella, in 1476, it was ordained that it should be at the
pleasure of the King to use the old forms or not, and that the dignity of
knighthood should be equally illustrious if they were omitted.
[Sidenote: Various ranks of knights.]
The highest class of knights in Spain was formed of the Knights of the
Spur, the Cavalleros de Espuela d'Orada. They were always hidalgos, or
gentlemen of birth of three descents. Kings' sons were of this class of
knighthood; and no one was crowned till he had been invested with the
order.[178]
Among the privileges of a knight of the Golden Spur, it is curious to
notice that no person could sit at table with him except one of his own
rank; no one of an inferior order was permitted to deny the infallibility
of his opinion, and to contradict him: and for offences against the state,
a knight of this class was to be beheaded, and not put to death in the
vulgar mode.
The circumstances in his conduct which were punishable with degradation
are interesting, as descriptive of Spanish manners. It was thought
necessary to forbid him from stealing the arms of another knight, from
selling his own, or losing them at play, or giving them to courtezans. The
punishment of degradation, as consequent on the admission of improper
persons into the order, is intelligible and just: his girdle and
spur-leathers were also to be cut, if he exercised any trade; except,
indeed, in captivity, when he was kindly permitted to support his life by
the best means of his ingenuity.[179]
The other class of knights was formed of cavalleros Armados, who enjoyed
most of the privileges of nobility. A knight of this rank was free from
the payment of taxes and tribute; and so were the knights of the Golden
Spur, not, however, as knights, but as hidalgos. The cavalleros d'Armados
were always made by the king's own hand; but the right of creating
cavalleros d'Espuela d'Orada existed in the will of every cavalier of the
order, though it was usually exercised only by the king.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account