The History of Creation, Vol. 1 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural CausesHaeckel, Ernst
Philosophy
The History of Creation, Vol. 1 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes
Haeckel, Ernst
Evolution; Heredity; Human beings -- Origin
Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology.—His Natural
History of the Earth’s Development.—Origin of the
Greatest Effects through the Multiplication of the
Smallest Causes.—Unlimited Extent of Geological
Periods.—Lyell’s Refutation of Cuvier’s History of
Creation.—The Establishment of the Uninterrupted
Connection of Historical Development by Lyell and
Darwin.—Biographical Notice of Charles Darwin.—His
Scientific Works.—His Theory of Coral Reefs.—Development
of the Theory of Selection.—A Letter of Darwin’s.—The
Contemporaneous Appearance of Darwin’s and Alfred
Wallace’s Theory of Selection.—Darwin’s Study of Domestic
Animals and Cultivated Plants.—Andreas Wagner’s notions
as to the Special Creation of Cultivated Organisms for the
good of Man.—The Tree of Knowledge in
Paradise.—Comparison between Wild and Cultivated
Organisms.—Darwin’s Study of Domestic
Pigeons.—Importance of Pigeon Breeding.—Common Descent
of all Races of Pigeons.
During the thirty years, from 1830 until 1859, when Darwin’s work
appeared, the ideas of creation introduced by Cuvier remained
predominant in the sciences of organic nature. People rested satisfied
with the unscientific assumption, that in the course of the earth’s
history, a series of inexplicable revolutions had periodically
annihilated the whole world of animals and plants, and that at the end
of each revolution, and the beginning of a new period, a new enlarged,
and improved edition of the organic population had appeared. Although
the number of these editions of creation was altogether problematical,
and in truth could not be fixed at all, and although the numerous
advances which, during this time, were made in all the departments of
zoology and botany demonstrated more and more that Cuvier’s hypothesis
was unfounded and untenable, and that Lamarck’s natural theory of
development was nearer the truth, yet the former maintained its
authority almost universally among biologists. This must, above all, be
ascribed to the veneration which Cuvier had acquired, and strikingly
illustrates how injurious to the progress of humanity a faith in any
definite authority may become. Authority, as Goethe once admirably said,
perpetuates the individual, which as an individual should pass away,
rejects and allows to pass that which should be held fast, and is the
main obstacle to the advance of humanity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account