The History of Creation, Vol. 2 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural CausesHaeckel, Ernst
Science
The History of Creation, Vol. 2 (of 2): Or the Development of the Earth and its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes
Haeckel, Ernst
Evolution; Heredity; Human beings -- Origin
(Compare my Monograph of the Calcareous Sponges, vol. i. p. 466,
etc.)
By ontogeny we have already gained five primordial stages of development
of the animal kingdom: (1) the Moneron; (2) the Amœba; (3) the Synamœba;
(4) the Planæa; and (5) the Gastræa. The former existence of these five
oldest primary forms, which succeeded one another, and which must have
lived in the Laurentian period, follows as a consequence of the
biogenetic principle; that is to say, from the parallelism and the
mechanico-causal connection of ontogenesis and phylogenesis. (Compare
vol. i. p. 309.) In our genealogical system of the animal kingdom we may
class all these animal forms, long since extinct, and, which on account
of the soft nature of their bodies could leave no fossil remains, among
the tribe of Primæval animals (Protozoa), which also comprises the still
living Infusoria and Gregarinæ.
The phyletic development of the six higher animal tribes, which are all
derived from the Gastræa, deviated at this point in two directions. In
other words, the _Gastræads_ (as we may call the group of forms
characterized by the Gastræa-type of structure), divided into two
divergent lines or branches; the one branch of Gastræads gave up free
locomotion, adhered to the bottom of the sea, and thus, by adopting an
adhesive mode of life, gave rise to the _Protascus_, the common primary
form of the _Animal-plants_ (Zoophyta). The other branch of the
Gastræads retained free locomotion, did not become adherent and later
on developed into the _Prothelmis_, the common primary form of _Worms_
(Vermes). (Compare p. 133.)
This latter tribe (as limited by modern zoology) is of the greatest
interest in the study of genealogy. For among Worms, as we shall see
later, there are, besides very numerous peculiar families, and besides
many independent classes, also very remarkable forms, which may be
considered as _forms of direct transition_ to the four higher animal
tribes. Both comparative anatomy and the ontogeny of these worms enable
us to recognize in them the nearest blood relations of those extinct
animal forms which were the original primary forms of the four higher
animal tribes. Hence these latter, the Molluscs, Star-fishes,
Articulated animals, and Vertebrate animals, do not stand in any close
blood relationship to one another, but have originated independently in
four different places out of the tribe of Worms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account