The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and politicalSamuelson, James
History
The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and political
Samuelson, James
Drinking of alcoholic beverages -- History; Temperance -- History
To the state of Roman society in Pliny’s day we shall return presently,
but although this is not a technical treatise on intoxicating liquors,
it is probable that some of our readers might desire to know something
of the character of the wines to which reference has been made in the
preceding observations, and we will therefore describe as concisely as
circumstances admit the method of their manufacture, and will add one or
two matters of interest bearing upon their use.
The manufacture of wine in Italy and Greece had been brought to great
perfection about the commencement of the Christian era, and from that
time to the fall of the Roman Empire its quality and varieties occupied
the attention of some of the most learned critics and historians. Three
distinct descriptions or qualities of wine were usually pressed from the
same grapes. The first may be compared to “virgin honey,” for it was
merely the juice or “must” which flowed from the fruit through the simple
pressure of the mass of grapes when they were put into the wine-press.
It was called _protrupum_, and was reserved for the manufacture of
a peculiarly fine description of wine. The second quality, _mustum
lixivium_, was the product of the first pressure; and after the grapes
had been completely pressed, the solid mass was taken out and once more
submitted to the same operation. The liquor from the second pressing
was known as _mustum tortivum_, and was used for the manufacture of
inferior wines, or for mixing with the better qualities. The “must” or
sweet juice was transferred to “_dolia_,” long bell-mouthed earthenware
vases, partially sunk in the earth, in an apartment on the ground floor
called the _cella vinaria_, and in these vessels the fermentation took
place, usually lasting nine days. After this, the upper part of the
inside of the _dolia_ having been previously smeared with a composition
of saffron, pitch, mastic, and fir cones, those vessels were closed with
lids, which were taken off from time to time to give air to the contents,
to remove impurities, and to add any substances which were deemed
necessary to give soundness to the wine. From the _dolia_ the finer
kinds of wine were transferred to other vessels called _amphoræ_, made
of earthenware or glass, and closed with a plug of wood or cork, which
was rendered impervious to air by being coated with clay or gypsum. These
_amphoræ_ bore the name of the wine they held, just as do our bottles,
and they were usually deposited in the upper floor of the house, it being
supposed that the smoke or warmth from the floors below, in passing
upwards, improved the quality of the wine. This effect was heightened by
constructing the bath furnaces below the apartments (_apothecæ_) in which
the wine was stored.[160] The commoner kinds were drawn direct from the
_dolia_, the original vessels in which fermentation had taken place; and
for the sale of wine in the streets and markets, or for its transport,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account