The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and politicalSamuelson, James
History
The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and political
Samuelson, James
Drinking of alcoholic beverages -- History; Temperance -- History
St. Gildas the Wise (A.D. 570) decreed, “If any one (that is, a monk)
through drinking too freely gets thick of speech, so that he cannot join
in the psalmody, he is to be deprived of his supper.”[218] No very severe
penalty that; for he would probably be all the better for the abstinence.
The year previously (A.D. 569), synods were held by St. David, and
amongst the decrees we find the following, which refers to priests:—“He
that forces another to get drunk out of hospitality must do penance as
if he had got drunk himself. But he who out of hatred or wickedness, in
order to disgrace or mock at others, forces them to get drunk, if he has
not already sufficiently done penance, must do penance as a murderer of
souls.”[219]
The reverend author whom we are quoting explains that the Anglo-Saxon
monasteries were sometimes villages or towns with many hundred inmates,
many of whom were laymen, and to them he is disposed to attribute the
drunkenness. Besides, of the monks he says, that after their days
in which long fasting was joined to manual labour, “it is no wonder
that, when the refreshment hour came, the beer got into the heads of
some.”[220] Other very conscientious writers do not, however, endorse
this view, and, as we have already said, they charge the monastic orders
with great excesses. One of these says that in early Anglo-Saxon times
both nunneries and convents were places in which the worst vices were
practised. It was the fashion, he says, for nobles and others to purchase
crown lands upon pretence of founding a monastery; upon which they made
themselves abbots, collected a convent out of expelled monks (a proof
that in some monasteries at least dissolute monks were not tolerated),
and led a life perfectly secular, bringing their wives into the
monastery, and being husbands and abbots at the same time. Nor were the
nunneries, at least some of them, any better. The nuns of Coldingham are
said to have spent their time in feasting, drinking, and gossiping. “They
also employed themselves in working fine clothes, dressing themselves
like brides, and acquiring the favour of strange men.”[221]
Against such places the Anglo-Saxon synods preached and remonstrated.
They forbade all the practices referred to, and advised the abbots and
monks to set a good example themselves, to be vigilant against theft,
and to inculcate reading both in monks and nuns; monasteries were not to
be made the receptacles of ludicrous arts, of poets, harpers, fiddlers,
and buffoons, such as we have described in connection with the festivals
of the laity. “They were not to be houses of gossiping and drunkenness;”
and “abbots and abbesses were to be chosen of approved life, not stained
with the crimes of child-getting, homicide, or theft, but leading regular
lives in their cloisters.”[222]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account