The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and politicalSamuelson, James
History
The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and political
Samuelson, James
Drinking of alcoholic beverages -- History; Temperance -- History
These “ales,” and other similar merrymakings, to which distance lends
such enchantment in the eyes of many Englishmen, soon became a public
nuisance, and they were conducted in such an unruly manner as to cause
great uneasiness to the civil authorities. Two of the most objectionable
features were, that they were often held in and about churches, as
already stated, and also that Sundays and feast-days were usually
selected for their celebration. Whatever has been said to the contrary,
it was the Church that encouraged them; not only the Roman Catholic
clergy,[241] but, for some time after the Reformation, the High Church
dignitaries of the Established Church, and chief amongst them was Laud,
Archbishop of Canterbury. They were the cause of bitter strife at the
period referred to. At first they were denounced by Puritan ministers of
all religions, and then, as the period of the Reformation approached,
efforts were made to suppress them. To those efforts Queen Elizabeth lent
her sanction, and in the 38th year of her reign the justices assembled at
Bridgewater ordered the total suppression of “church-ales,” “clerk-ales,”
and “bid-ales,” and the decree was signed by the Lord Chief-Justice.
Similar orders were issued and enforced in the reign of James I.; but
in the following reign, when Chief-Justice Richardson and Baron Denham
published an order to suppress Sunday revels, the former was told in
the most insulting manner by Laud, the Primate, that the justices had
exceeded their duties; that wakes and ales were religious institutions;
and that although some correction of their abuses might be required,
the lay tribunals had nothing to do with the matter, which was one of
spiritual jurisdiction.[242]
A violent controversy followed between the Puritans and the clergy of the
Church of England; and so long as they were allowed to last, the terrors
of the Star Chamber and High Commission were employed by the latter
to counteract any efforts that were made to suppress the scandalous
desecration of sacred days and sacred places. But the Commonwealth, which
purged the country of many abuses, at least corrected that one. An Act of
Parliament was passed forbidding the holding of “ales” and merrymakings
within the precincts of places of worship or on the Sabbaths, and from
that time they gradually lost their importance. Although the divorce
between religion and beer was not then completely effected, the open
recognition and support of the Church has not since been extended to the
liquor traffic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account