The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and politicalSamuelson, James
History
The history of drink : $b A review, social, scientific, and political
Samuelson, James
Drinking of alcoholic beverages -- History; Temperance -- History
The inquiry into the condition of religious houses under Henry VIII.,
which led to the suppression of 376 of those establishments, and the
transfer of their revenues to the crown, revealed a state of affairs
which some Catholics of to-day are reluctant to credit. But, as one
of our most accurate and unprejudiced historians has said, the reports
of those visitors were so minute and specific, that it is rather a
preposterous degree of incredulity to reject their testimony when it
bears hard upon the regulars; and the commendation bestowed upon some
religious houses as pure and unexceptionable affords a presumption that
the censure upon others was not an indiscriminate prejudging of their
merits.[255]
The abbots were found to keep mistresses, to be the fathers of grown-up
sons, who lived with them openly; and the inferior officers were shown to
be dishonest men, who obtained their posts by flattery or purchase, and
whose vices, when once they were in office, were of the worst kind. They
oppressed people with violence and unfair exactions, frequented taverns
and other indecorous places, had the company of women in private places
and to eat and drink with them.[256]
The monks themselves were accused of the gravest breaches of the
law—treason, perjury, gambling, drunkenness, “swearing by the body of
Christ,” murderous assaults upon each other when they were gambling or in
their cups, and even deliberate murder for gain. “A certain knight,” we
are told, “had left a hundred marks by will to a certain house, and lay
there sick; upon getting well, the monks, that they might not lose the
money, plotted his death by poison or suffocation.”[257]
Nor were the nuns much better. Amongst the injunctions to the convent
of Appleton, A.D. 1489, is one: “Item, that none of your sisters use
the alehouse, nor the waterside, where course of strangers dayly
resorte.” And in another case the question was asked: “Item, whether
any of the sisters be comenly drunke.” They were accused of avarice,
brawling, voluptuousness, and sloth; and one of them, the Prioress of
Rumsey, was a notorious drunkard.[258] What the monks and nuns did in
and about the convents, the wandering friars performed throughout the
length and breadth of the land. They were vowed to poverty, and many of
them were bright examples of virtue and holiness, going about preaching
and ministering to the poor, healing dissensions, and, as well as they
were able, protecting the oppressed. But others accumulated property by
the most detestable means—some even by procuring pardon for murderers;
they were great liars, fraudulent, luxurious, and debauched. “They knew
all the taverns, hostelers, and tapsters in every town, but shunned
the beggars.” Their time was often spent in intrigues with women,
interference with families, and idle and useless gossip.[259]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account