The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
While Major Hillas was thus laudably engaged, Mr. John Fenton, a
neighbouring gentleman, came up, and interfered in a manner which
appeared to him highly incorrect; an altercation arose, which ended in
Mr. Fenton’s threatening to throw Major Hillas into the sea. He,
however, continued his exertions from the 6th to the 8th December, on
which day Mr. Fenton arrived with a party of yeomanry, and forced the
property out of his hands. It was in vain that Major Hillas
remonstrated; that he declared that his object was not salvage, and that
he only endeavoured to save as much as possible from the wreck for the
benefit of the owners. Being thus frustrated in his intentions, he made
a journey to Scotland, where the owners of the vessel resided, in order
to make them acquainted with all the circumstances of the business. On
his return Mr. Fenton thought proper to send him a message, which the
Major very properly declined accepting. An investigation as to the right
of salvage afterwards took place, during the course of which Major
Hillas complained that he had been most unhandsomely treated by Mr.
Fenton, who had interfered unjustifiably; and by taking the mate out of
his hands, secured to himself, in an unhandsome manner, the legal
custody of the vessel. Four days after the close of the investigation,
Mr. John Fenton delivered a message to Major Hillas from Mr. Thomas
Fenton. Major Hillas accepted the challenge, and when on the ground
addressed the crowd of bystanders, saying—“I am sorry the mistaken laws
of honour oblige me to come here to defend myself, and I declare to God
I have no animosity to man or woman on the face of the earth.” Major
Hillas, in anticipation of a fatal result, had dressed himself in a full
suit of mourning. On the first shot he fell dead. Mr. Fenton was
afterwards tried for the capital offence, but was acquitted by the jury.
BETWEEN P. DILLON, ESQ., AND B. KANE, ESQ.
Dublin, Feb. 21, 1816.
Yesterday evening a meeting took place near Merlin Park, between P.
Dillon, Esq., of this town, and B. Kane, Esq., of ——, when the former
received his adversary’s ball under the right breast, and instantly
expired.
These two gentlemen were close friends for many years. Mr. Dillon had
fought several duels, in all of which Mr. Kane acted as his second. And
it is remarkable that Mr. Dillon’s father lost his life in an affair of
honour with the late Malachy Fallon, Esq., at the same age, and nearly
on the same spot where his son fell.
BETWEEN MR. ALLEY AND MR. ADOLPHUS.
December 2, 1816.
A dispute between Mr. Alley and Mr. Adolphus, which originated in the
court of the Old Bailey, during a late trial, has at length been brought
to a termination, and without any fatal result.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account