The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
When, however, four persons were found going to the house
of one, for the purpose of forcing him to fight a duel, though the duel
might be conducted most fairly, according to the laws of honour, it was
murder, under certain circumstances, in the eye of the law. Mr. Cuddie
received the ball fired from the pistol of William Brittlebank; he was
then carried into the kitchen, he believed, by Spencer and Andrew
Brittlebank. What followed would be proved by witnesses; and he expected
it would be proved, that Andrew Brittlebank had at first denied having
been present; but when the deceased stated him to be there, he then
said, “Well, since you say so, did I not try to prevent the duel, by
pressing you to offer something in the shape of an apology?” William
Brittlebank had said, that the deceased must consider Spencer as his
friend; and it would be shown, that when Cuddie, in a dying state, had
been pressed to declare the duel had been a fair one, he declined doing
so, though aware of his situation, sometimes by expressions, and at
others by actions of dissent, such as shaking his head; and he certainly
died without any such admission. Should the evidence fail to make out
the charge, those concerned for the prosecution would be most happy to
hear of a verdict of acquittal: should the facts be proved, their
righteous verdict must be given; and, painful as it might be to
themselves and all who heard it, they would have but one duty to
perform.
A variety of witnesses were called, who proved the circumstances under
which Mr. Cuddie lost his life. It appeared that he had received much
provocation; but it appeared that the prisoners had endeavoured to give
him every assistance after he received the wound. The following is a
copy of the declaration made by Mr. Cuddie on his death-bed:—
“The declaration of William Cuddie, of Winster, surgeon, made before me,
Philip Gell, Esq., one of his Majesty’s justices of the peace for the
county of Derby, this 22nd day of May, 1821, who saith, that he was
called upon by William Brittlebank, of Winster, to fight a duel, and
that he wished to avoid doing so. That Edmund Spencer, of Bakewell,
surgeon, came to him on the 22nd of May, instant, and told him that
William Brittlebank and his brothers were in the garden waiting for him,
and that he, William Cuddie, must make an apology, or fight. That he,
William Cuddie, went to the garden, and refused to make an apology. That
Edmund Spencer opened his coat and showed him two pistols, one of which
he took, and William Brittlebank took the other; that they separated to
the distance of fifteen yards, or more. That Edmund Spencer threw up his
hat as a signal, and they both fired their pistols as near together as
possible.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account