The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
The following account of the proceedings taken by the Superior Court of
Law for New Kent County, in consequence of a projected duel between
Colonel Graves and Captain Lacy, is from the Virginia Times, of the 23d
of May:—The Superior Court of Law for New Kent County tried and
determined five several presentments, found by the grand jury against
Colonel Richard Graves, in each of which the defendant was charged with
a violation of the act to suppress duelling. The case, during the last
session of the legislature, had been laid before that body by Captain
Archibald Lacy, with the view of removing Colonel Graves from his seat.
The several presentments charged Richard Graves; first, with sending a
challenge to Archibald Lacy to fight a duel; second, to fight a duel
with poison; third, with sending a challenge to Archibald Lacy to fight
a duel in the following manner—that two cups should be filled, the one
with pure water and the other with deadly poison, and that two tickets
should be rolled up and put in a hat, and they, Graves and Lacy, should
draw lots who should drink the cup of poison; fourth, with sending a
challenge to fight a duel with knives, &c.; and fifth, for challenging
him to draw a lot for a cup of poison, which cup was to be drunk by the
person to whom the same should fall by allotment.
To these charges the defendant pleaded not guilty; and the evidence went
to establish the said charges. Verdict, “Not Guilty.”
BETWEEN THE MARQUIS OF LONDONDERRY AND MR. BATTIER.
May 6, 1824.
A duel took place between the Marquis of Londonderry and Ensign Battier,
late a cornet of the 10th Royal Hussars, in consequence of a letter
which he had published, in reference to his dispute with the officers of
that regiment, in which he had stated, that the noble lord “sheltered
himself under his rank.” Sir Henry Hardinge, Secretary to the Ordnance,
was the Marquis’s second, and the second of Mr. Battier was Colonel
Western. They met at a distance of ten paces. Sir Henry gave the choice
of his pistols to Colonel Western. The word was given. Lord
Londonderry’s shot passed Mr. Battier on the right; while Mr. Battler’s
pistol missed fire. The marquis requested his antagonist might have
another shot; but this Colonel Western declined, on the part of Mr.
Battier, and thus the firing ended.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account