The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
“I was one of those who, at first, thought the proposed plan might be
practicable, and prove an antidote to the principles of the London
University. I was not, however, very sanguine in my expectations, seeing
many difficulties likely to arise in the execution of the suggested
arrangement; and I confess that I felt rather doubtful as to the
sincerity of the motives that had actuated some of the prime movers in
this undertaking, when I considered that the noble Duke at the head of
his Majesty’s Government had been induced, on this occasion, to assume a
new character, and to step forward himself as the public advocate of
religion and morality. Late political events have convinced me, that the
whole transaction was intended as a blind to the Protestant and
high-church party; that the noble Duke, who had, for some time previous
to that period, determined upon ‘breaking in upon the constitution of
1688,’ might the more effectually, under the cloak of some outward show
of zeal for the Protestant religion, carry on his insidious designs for
the infringement of our liberties, and the introduction of Popery into
every department of the state.”
This letter was published in the newspapers, and gave rise to the
following correspondence:—
(1.) FROM THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON TO THE EARL OF WINCHILSEA.
“London, March 16, 1829.
“MY LORD,
“I have just perused, in the Standard newspaper of this day, a letter
addressed to Henry Nelson Coleridge, Esq., dated Eastwell Park, March
14, signed Winchilsea and Nottingham; and I shall be very much obliged
to your lordship if you will let me know whether that letter was written
by you, and published by your authority.
I am, &c. WELLINGTON.”
(2.) FROM THE SAME TO THE SAME.
“London, March 18, 1829.
“MY LORD,
“I wrote to your lordship, on the 16th, a letter, of which I enclose a
duplicate, as, not having yet received an answer from your lordship, I
am apprehensive that the original may not have reached you, although I
directed it to your house in Suffolk Street. I am just going to Windsor
to attend his Majesty, but I shall be in town this night.
I am, &c.
“WELLINGTON.”
(3.) FROM THE EARL OF WINCHILSEA TO THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON.
“Eastwell Park, March 18, 1829.
“MY LORD,
“The enclosed is a copy of the answer which I returned, by this day’s
post, to your grace’s letter, which only reached me this morning. I
intend leaving this place for London to-morrow morning, and expect to be
at 7, Suffolk Street, between four and five in the afternoon. I have,
&c.
“WINCHILSEA AND NOTTINGHAM.”
(4.) FROM THE SAME TO THE SAME.
“Eastwell Park, Ashford, March 18, 1829.
“MY LORD,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account