The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
But the sentiments and principles on the subject of duelling, avowed and
acted upon in the progress of this trial, will be of far more importance
in their consequences than the issue of the trial itself. An
opportunity, in fact, is about to be afforded your Lordships of adding
yet another benefit to the many which England has already experienced at
your hands—an opportunity of stamping your past exertions in the cause
of truth, religion, and civilisation, with the seals of sincerity and
consistency: nay, words still stronger befit the occasion; and I fear
not to say, that your Lordships stand at this moment in a situation of
great responsibility, in which the eyes of the nation are fixed upon
you, anxiously expecting that you will embrace this favourable occasion
to interpose the shield of your influence between society and that
systematic violation of its laws which has so long and so unhappily
prevailed amongst us. It is on the question, therefore, of duelling,
that I would now respectfully engage your Lordships’ attention.
Every one will admit the absurdity of the _bathos_ from the lance to the
pistol,—from the grave and noble _auto da fe_ which the combat of the
chivalrous ages exhibited in its solemn appeal to God, as the witness
and the judge of right and wrong, to the modern system, resorted to on
the most trivial as well as the most important occasions, and as
striking a proof of the degenerate faithlessness of the present, as the
ancient custom, of which it is the distorted image, is of the simple
faith and piety of the olden time.
The argument for the defence of duelling, as at present constituted, is
short, simple, and intelligible. The ‘vantage-ground of principle is
conceded at once; but the world, it is contended, could not go on
without it. There are points where human legislation must stop, where
unwritten must take the place of written laws; society cannot be kept in
check except by fear of personal consequences attendant on the violation
of those unwritten laws: the system of duelling affords that check;
expediency, therefore, requires the toleration of duelling.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account