The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
“You complained yesterday before five hundred gentlemen, that you had
been _stabbed in the dark_ by the North Briton. But I believe you were
not so much in the _dark_ as you affected and chose to be. Was the
complaint made before so many gentlemen on purpose that they might
interpose? To cut off every pretence of this kind, as to the author, I
whisper in your ear, that every passage of the North Briton in which you
have been named or alluded to, was written by
“Your humble servant,
“JOHN WILKES.”
To this letter Mr. Martin returned the following answer:—
“Arlington Street, Nov. 16, 1763.
“SIR,
“As I said in the House of Commons yesterday, that the writer of the
North Briton, who had stabbed me in the dark, was a cowardly as well as
a malignant scoundrel, and your letter of this morning’s date
acknowledges that every passage of the North Briton in which I have been
named, or even alluded to, was written by yourself, I must take the
liberty to repeat, that you are a malignant and infamous scoundrel, and
that I desire to give you an opportunity of showing me whether the
epithet _cowardly_ was rightly applied or not. I desire that you may
meet me in Hyde Park immediately, with a brace of pistols each, to
determine our difference. I shall go to the ring in Hyde Park, with my
pistols, so concealed that nobody may see them, and I will wait in
expectation of you one hour. As I shall call on my way at your house to
deliver this letter, I propose to go from thence directly to the ring in
Hyde Park, from whence we may proceed, if it be necessary, to any more
private place. And I mention that I shall wait an hour, in order to give
you the full time to meet me.
“I am, sir, your humble servant,
“SAMUEL MARTIN.”
When the parties met in Hyde Park, they walked together a little while
to avoid some company which seemed coming up to them. They brought each
a pair of pistols. When they were alone, the first fire was from Mr.
Martin’s pistol, which missed Mr. Wilkes. The pistol in Mr. Wilkes’s
hand only flashed in the pan. The gentlemen then each took one of the
remaining pistols. Mr. Wilkes missed, and the ball of Mr. Martin’s
pistol lodged in Mr. Wilkes’s belly. He bled immediately very much. Mr.
Martin came up, and desired to give him all the assistance in his power.
Mr. Wilkes replied, that Mr. Martin had behaved like a man of honour;
that he was killed; and insisted on Mr. Martin’s making his immediate
escape, adding, that no person should know from him how the affair
happened. Upon this they parted. Mr. Wilkes was carried home; but would
not tell any circumstance of the case, till he found it was perfectly
known. He only said to the surgeon, that it was an affair of honour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account