The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
The day following, Mr. Wilkes, imagining himself in great danger,
returned to Mr. Martin his letter, that no evidence might appear against
him, and insisted upon it, with his own relatives, that in case of his
death, no trouble should be given to Mr. Martin, for he had behaved as a
man of honour.
The ball was extracted by Mr. Graves, a surgeon. It had struck Mr.
Wilkes’s coat-button, entered his belly half an inch below the navel,
and sunk obliquely on the right side towards the groin; but it had not
penetrated the cavity of the abdomen. It was extracted behind.
When he was able to write, he sent notice by letter to the Speaker of
the House of Commons of the condition of his health; and on Friday, the
16th, the House made the following order:—“That Dr. Heberden, physician,
and Mr. Cæsar Hawkins, one of His Majesty’s sergeant-surgeons, be
desired to attend John Wilkes, Esq., to observe the progress of his
cure; and that they, together with Dr. Brocklesby and Mr. Graves, do
attend this House to report their opinion thereupon, on the 19th of
January next, in case the said John Wilkes, Esq. be not then able to
attend in his place.”
The order being sent to Dr. Heberden, by order of the Speaker, he sent
it to Dr. Brocklesby, with a letter, desiring to know when he might
attend Dr. Brocklesby to Mr. Wilkes. Dr. Brocklesby sent the order of
the House and Dr. Heberden’s letter to Mr. Wilkes, who immediately
showed his delicacy of feeling on the subject by sending a polite card
to Dr. Heberden, saying, that he was well satisfied with the attention
and skill of Dr. Brocklesby and Mr. Graves; that he did not wish to see
Dr. Heberden for some weeks. He sent a similar card to Mr. Hawkins.[6]
Mr. Martin immediately proceeded to Paris; and on Mr. Wilkes’s arrival
in that city, notes, and a friendly visit, were exchanged between them.
Mr. Martin’s conduct in this transaction had been highly honourable; but
the public was so much exasperated at the danger to which Wilkes had
been exposed, that no credit was given to the spirit which his
antagonist had displayed. On the contrary, it was remarked, that Mr.
Martin had taken no notice of the objectionable passage in the North
Briton until about eight months after the publication, and that in so
public and official a manner before the House, as almost to demand an
interference. He was also accused of having during that period practised
every day at a target, Sundays not excepted; and also with not having
returned Mr. Wilkes’s letter till a month after the duel, with a view,
as it was suggested, had Mr. Wilkes speedily recovered, of making use of
it in evidence of his being concerned in the North Briton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account