The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
“The Earl of Shelburne.”
BETWEEN MR. DONOVAN AND CAPT. JAMES HANSON.
April, 1780.
At the assizes at Kingston, in Surrey, the trials on the Crown side came
on before the Hon. Mr. Justice Gould, and a special jury, when Mr.
Donovan (who voluntarily surrendered himself) was tried for having
killed, in a duel, Captain James Hanson. It appeared by a number of
respectable witnesses, that the deceased was entirely in fault, and had
forced Mr. Donovan to meet him in a field near the Dog and Duck. It also
appeared that the only ground of quarrel between the prisoner and the
deceased was, that Mr. Donovan interfered between Captain Hanson and
another person, and prevented their fighting; on which Captain Hanson
gave him very abusive language, and insisted that “he would make him
smell powder.”
The deceased was wounded by a pistol bullet in the belly, and lived
about twenty-four hours after. He declared to two eminent surgeons who
attended him, and to several other persons, that Mr. Donovan behaved,
during the action, and after it, with the greatest honour, tenderness,
and concern. And he particularly desired that no prosecution should be
carried on against him, as he himself was solely in fault, by an
unprovoked rashness of temper and heat of passion.
The learned Judge gave an excellent charge to the jury, and said,
“Though he allowed that all the circumstances were as favourable to the
prisoner, as in such a case could be; yet, as the idea of honour was so
often mentioned, he must say, and inform the jury and the auditors, that
it was false honour in men to break the laws of God and their country;
that going out to fight a duel was, in both parties, a deliberate
resolution to commit murder; and there could be no honour in so savage a
custom, which, however disguised in words, is contrary to the principles
and happiness of society, and ought to be reprobated in every
well-regulated community.”
The jury, without going out of court, acquitted Mr. Donovan of the
murder, and found him “guilty” of “manslaughter,” on the coroner’s
inquest. The Judge fined him ten pounds to the King, which being paid in
the court, he was immediately discharged.
BETWEEN THE REV. MR. BATE AND MR. R——, A STUDENT OF THE LAW.
September 7, 1780.
A duel was fought in Hyde Park, between the Rev. Mr. Bate, of
Surrey-street, and Mr. R——, a student of the law, late of St. John’s
College, Cambridge.
The quarrel arose from some circumstances relating to the conduct of the
Morning Post, in which they were both engaged. The chance of the first
fire falling to Mr. Bate, he discharged his pistol, and hit Mr. R—— in
the fleshy part of the right arm. The wound, however, was not sufficient
to incapacitate him from returning the fire, which he did, but without
effect.
The seconds now interfered, and the affair was adjusted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account