The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Philosophy
The History of Duelling. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Millingen, J. G. (John Gideon)
Dueling
Captain Cuthbert, in order to obviate all increasing disturbance in
Mount-street, had directed that no carriage should be suffered to pass
that way. Lord Lonsdale, who came in his carriage to Mount-street, was
consequently obstructed; and finding the impediment insuperable, his
temper was somewhat ruffled. Addressing himself, therefore, to Captain
Cuthbert, he exclaimed, “You rascal, do you know that I am a peer of the
realm?” The Captain immediately replied, “I don’t know that you are a
peer; but I know you are a scoundrel, for applying such a term to an
officer on duty; and I will make you answer for it.” A meeting, of
course, took place, and concluded as stated.
BETWEEN LORD LAUDERDALE AND GENERAL ARNOLD.
July 2, 1792.
Lord Lauderdale attended by the Right Hon. Charles James Fox, and
General Arnold with Lord Hawke as his friend, had a meeting near Kilburn
Wells, to terminate a misunderstanding which it was found impossible to
conciliate.
Lord Lauderdale received the General’s fire unhurt, when, his Lordship
declining to return the shot, the seconds retired for about ten minutes,
and the result was the finishing of the affair. The noble Earl, upon
being desired to fire, observed that he did not come there to fire at
the General, nor could he retract the offensive expressions; if General
Arnold was not satisfied, he might fire till he was. A like rencontre
took place a few days before between the noble Earl and the Duke of
Richmond.
BETWEEN MONS. CHAUVIGNY AND MONS. C. LAMETH.
November 8, 1792.
This affair, which originated in a difference of opinion, had been
undecided for two years. It appears that M. de Chauvigny, having learned
the arrival of his antagonist in this country, gave him a meeting, and
proposed to fight him, which the latter assented to. The parties fought
in a field near the place of Mons. Lameth’s residence, and he was
dangerously wounded in the belly. The affair ended by both declaring
themselves satisfied, and giving their word of honour that the matter
was finally adjusted.
The seconds were, for Mons. Chauvigny, the Duke de Pienne and the Count
de Chabanc; and for Mons. Lameth, the Duke d’Aiguillon and Mr. Maselet.
BETWEEN MR. PUREFOY AND COLONEL ROPER.
Maidstone, August 14, 1794.
At these assizes this day, Mr. Thomas Purefoy was indicted for the
“wilful murder” of Colonel Roper in a duel, which took place on the 21st
of December, 1788. The interval which had occurred between that time and
the prosecution, was not assignable to the prosecutor, as Mr. Purefoy
had, for the greater part of the time, been out of the kingdom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account