The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
side with a high appreciation of its general fairness, and gratitude
to the scribes who have preserved for us so much of the records of
the past, even though their narrative is often somewhat arid. On the
whole it seems the wisest, in fact the only possible course, to take
thankfully the information which the Chronicle gives us as to these
two mist-enshrouded centuries, not absolutely maintaining its accuracy
in every particular, but yielding to it a provisional assent, until
either by internal or external evidence it shall be proved to be
legendary or impossible.
It may be as well to state here that there are various manuscripts
of the Chronicle hailing from different ecclesiastical centres, the
divergences of which in the later centuries of Anglo-Saxon history
are sometimes of great importance. For the present, however, this
question does not arise. Save for a few not very important Northumbrian
interpolations, the manuscripts of the Chronicle may be considered
as one, and their source of origin may be considered to have been
Winchester, the focus of all West Saxon government and culture.
The allusions made in the Chronicle to the departure of the Romans
from Britain are naturally very scanty: “In 409 the Goths broke up the
city of Rome, and never after that did the Romans rule in Britain”.
“In 418 the Romans gathered together all the gold-hoards that were in
Britain and hid some in the earth, so that no man thenceforth should
ever find them, and some they took with them into Gaul.” Let us proceed
therefore to examine the evidence furnished from this source as to the
foundation of the kingdoms of Kent, Sussex, Wessex, and Northumbria. As
to the early history of East Anglia, Essex and Mercia the Chronicle is
altogether silent.
_Kent._--A.D. 449.[28] Wyrtgeorn [Vortigern] invites the Angles to
Britain. They come over in three “keels” and land at Heopwines-fleet
[Ebbs-fleet in the Isle of Thanet], and he gives them lands in the
south-east of the country on condition of their fighting the Picts.
This they do successfully, but they send home for more of their
countrymen, telling them of the worthlessness of the Britons and the
goodness of the land. Their generals were two brothers, Hengest and
Horsa, sons of Wictgils with the pedigree as given by Bede.
A.D. 455. Hengest and Horsa fight with Vortigern at Aegeles-threp
[Aylesford on the Medway]. Horsa is slain. Hengest assumes the title of
king, and associates with himself his son Aesc.
A.D. 456. Hengest and Aesc fight with the Britons at Crecgan-ford
[Crayford, about six miles south-east of Woolwich], and slay 4,000
of them. The Britons evacuate Kent and with much fear flee to
London-borough.
A.D. 465. Hengest and Aesc fight with the “Welshmen” [Britons] near
Wippedes-fleote, and there slay twelve Welsh nobles, themselves losing
one thane, whose name was Wipped.
A.D. 473. Hengest and Aesc fight with the “Welshmen,” and take booty
past counting. The Welsh flee “as a man fleeth fire”.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account