The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
The Bernician king evidently conceived of heaven as of a Northumbrian
palace hall: and not unnaturally he, who knew his hands to be stained
with the blood of his gracious kinsman Oswin, desired to enlist the
sympathies of the most powerful patron possible on his side against
the day when he should have to plead for entrance therein. Oswy’s
decision was, of course, final. All over Northumberland the Roman
customs as to Easter and the tonsure now prevailed. Bishop Colman, who
could not reconcile himself to the new ways, abdicated his see and
returned to Iona, accompanied by all the Irish monks from Lindisfarne
and by thirty Anglian brethren who shared their opinions. From Iona
he afterwards went to Ireland and founded a monastery on an island
off the coast of Mayo, which had not a very successful career. Cedd,
bishop of the East Saxons, who had acted as interpreter and to some
extent as mediator between the two parties, accepted the decision of
the synod, and returned to enforce it in London and the rest of his
diocese. Everywhere now throughout Teutonic Britain unity with Rome
was established, and little more than a century elapsed before all the
Celtic communities in Iona, in Ireland, even in sturdy recalcitrant
Wales, had adopted the Roman Easter and the coronal tonsure.[74]
The change was one which probably ought upon the whole to be considered
beneficial. Unity was the thing now most needed, both politically and
ecclesiastically, and unity had to be achieved by the State through
the Church. It was, therefore, well that this pebble, which broke the
full flow of the stream towards unity, should be removed out of the
way by the synod of Whitby. It was well, also, that there should be no
hindrance to free and full intercourse between the ecclesiastics of
England and those of the continent. True, the civilisation of Italy
and Gaul in the seventh century was nothing to boast of. To Cicero
or to Marcus Aurelius it would have seemed like barbarism: but it
was superior to the barbarism of the Saxon, perhaps in some respects
superior even to the undoubtedly high civilisation, at this time, of
Celtic Tara and Armagh. Still it was not all gain that resulted from
the decision of the synod of Whitby and the rupture of the spiritual
bond that had bound Lindisfarne to Iona. Even Bede, with all his
loyalty to Rome and abhorrence of the Celtic Easter, seems to feel
this fact; else why does he introduce just at this point an eloquent
panegyric on the simple life of Colman and his predecessors, their
genuine poverty and the faithfulness with which they at once handed to
the poor any money which they received from the rich? “At that time
the religious habit was held in great veneration, so that wheresoever
cleric or monk appeared, he was joyfully welcomed by all as the servant
of God; those who met him on the road with bent necks rejoiced to
receive the blessing of his lips or of his extended hand: they listened
eagerly to his words of exhortation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account